摘要
目的 研究有华法林应用指征的患者行冠脉介入手术(PCI)后采用华法林、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷三联抗栓和华法林、氯吡格雷双联抗栓治疗方案的有效性和安全性.方法 回顾性入选2006-2011年期间我院75名有明确华法林应用指征的PCI术后患者.根据患者的用药方案,分为三联抗栓组(TA):华法林+阿司匹林+氯吡格雷,双联抗栓组(DA):氯吡格雷+华法林.出院后对患者的用药情况、临床终点事件及安全性进行12个月随访.结果 TA组患者51人,DA组患者24人.在12个月随访期间,TA组中有2例患者死亡,DA组没有死亡病例,两组死亡率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.332).安全性方面,两组都没有严重出血病例,TA组有9例患者发生小出血,DA组患者没有发生小出血,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=-0.028).结论 有华法林应用指征的患者需要根据患者的情况制订个体化治疗方案.对于老年、既往有出血病史的患者,氯吡格雷联合华法林的双联抗栓治疗策略同样有效,且安全性更高.
Objective To compare the effect and safety of triple antithrombotic therapy including as- pirin, clopidogrel and warfarin to dual antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel and warfarin for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods 75 patients on long-term oral warfarin treatment after PCI were retrospectively investigated during 2006 to 2011. They were divided into two groups, triple an- tithrombotic therapy group (TA) were treated with aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin. Dual antithrombotic thera- py group (DA) were treated with clopidogrel and warfarin. All patients were followed-up by at least 12 months after PCI. Incidences of reinfarction, all-cause-death, bleeding adverse events were collected. Results There were 51 patients in TA group and 24 patients in DA group. During the 12 months follow-up, 2 pa- tients died in TA group and no death in DA group (P=0.332). According to bleeding adverse events, no ma- jor bleeding events happened in both group. 9 patients in TA group reported minor bleeding and none in DA group (P=0.028). Conclusion Individual strategy was important for patients on long-term oral warfarin treat- ment after PCI. Based on our study, dual antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel and warfarin was effect and safe as well.
出处
《中国心血管病研究》
CAS
2013年第11期848-851,共4页
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
关键词
冠脉介入术
华法林
抗栓治疗
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Warfarin
Antithrombotie therapy