期刊文献+

忽视“证伪”教学的原因及对策——基于小学数学课堂教学实践的思考 被引量:8

The Reasons and Solving Methods of Ignoring“Falsification”in Mathematic Teaching——Consideration Based on Primary School Mathematic Classroom Teaching Practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "证伪"在数学学习中有着相当重要的价值。而观察现今的课堂,却存在着三种忽视"证伪"教学的典型现象:无"伪"可证,有"伪"不证,证"伪"不实。产生的原因相应是:教师控制课堂,目标定位偏颇,教学机智不足。实践中,相应的对策分别是:通过改变教师控制课堂的局面,关注学生主动学习的发生,不怕"伪结论"生成;重视课堂教学过程目标的设计,认识"证伪"教学的价值,抓住"有价值的‘证伪’"机会;提高教师对教学资源价值的判断力,有效组织"证伪"过程,提升"证伪"的学习价值。 Falsification has great importance in mathematic learning. However, nowadays classroom teaching has ignored the teaching of falsification. There are basically three phenomena: first, teacher offers no false answers for students to discuss; second, teacher presents the false answer but doesn't direct students to prove its falseness; third, the process of falsification is not reliable. The reasons of these phenomena are teacher's dominance of class, target is not clear and the teacher's lack of teaching wisdom. There are three methods to solve the problems. First, we need to change teacher's dominance role in classroom and pay more attention to students' initiative learning. Second, Teachers should clear the target of teaching process, realize the value of falsification teaching and make use of the valuable false answers. Third, teachers need to improve their senses of judgment of valuable teaching materials so that they could effectively organize the falsification process and improve the learning value of falsification.
作者 费岭峰
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期55-59,共5页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
关键词 小学数学 证伪教学 无“伪”可证 有“伪”不证 证“伪”不实 primary school mathematics falsification teaching no false answer to be discussed ignore the false answer unreliable falsification
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献7

  • 1孟建伟.从知识教育到文化教育——论教育观的转变[J].教育研究,2007,28(1):14-19. 被引量:133
  • 2卡尔·波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社.1999:42-73.
  • 3《SAT年度报告:中国比美国学生低300分》,网易教育,2011年12月21日.
  • 4卡尔·波普尔.猜想与反驳[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1986.39-40,183-186.
  • 5莱斯利·P·斯特弗 杰里·盖尔 高文 徐斌燕译.教育中的建构主义[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.15,17,21,25.
  • 6PaulErnest 齐建华译.数学教育哲学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1998..
  • 7石中英.教育哲学导论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.87.

共引文献42

同被引文献24

引证文献8

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部