期刊文献+

基于句法结构培养差异的英语复句处理能力研究 被引量:2

The effect of explicit syntactic instruction on Chinese learners' ability in processing English complex L2 sentences
原文传递
导出
摘要 了解和把握句法结构培养程度对中国学习者处理英语复句能力的影响是英语教学质量保障的关键。本研究采用问卷调查和阅读行为测试两种方法,选取60名所受不同句法结构培养的中国英语学习者和20名英国本族语者为样本,对其在四种罕见英语复句形态结构复杂性、语义通达性的判断及复句理解准确度方面的处理能力进行研究。我们发现,随着句法结构培养水平的提高,中国学习者在英语复句理解准确度及语义通达性判断方面表现为超过或接近英语本族语者的趋势;而在复句形态结构复杂性判断方面却没有表现出随句法结构培养水平的提高而呈上升的趋势。此外,由于句法结构培养水平的不同,中国学习者在英语复句的处理方法上受句法结构和语义因素的影响也有差异。 The key to guarantee the quality of English teaching in China is to understand and grasp the effect of the amount of explicit instruction on syntactic grammar on Chinese learners' ability to deal with English complex sentences. This study is to investigate the relationship between amount of explicit syntactic instruction and the ability to comprehend four types of complex English sentences.,based on questionnaire and reading comprehension test on 60 Chinese students of English as a L2 with different amount of explicit syntactic instruction and 20 native-English speakers. It is found that more explicit instruction on syntactic grammar may result in higher accurate comprehension and good performance in plausibility judgment,which is equivalent to native English speakers,but poor performance in sentence complexity judgment. In addition,Chinese students with different amount of explicit instruction on syntactic grammar are also different in using syntactic and semantic information in complex L2 English sentence processing. On the basis of these findings,the theoretical value and implications are discussed at the end of the paper.
作者 任虎林
机构地区 华北电力大学
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期29-34,94,共6页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目编号:09QR57)资助
关键词 句法结构培养 处理能力 语义通达 explicit instruction on syntactic grammar processing ability semantic plausibility judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Chipere, N. 2003. Understanding Complex Sentences : Native Speaker Variations in Syntactic Competence. Palgrave, Bas- ingstoke.
  • 2Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foils.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 2001. "Derivation by phase". Ken Hale: A Life in Language ( pp 1 - 54 ). Kenstovicz, Michael (ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • 6Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2006. " Grammatical processing in first and second language learners". Applied Psycholin- guistics 27. 3 -42.
  • 7Dabrowska, E. 1997. "The LAD goes to school: A cautiona- ry tale for nativists". Linguistics 35, 735 -766.
  • 8Felser, C. & L. Roberts. 2007. "Processing wh - depend- encies in a second language: A cross - modal priming study". Second Language Research 23/1, 9 -36.
  • 9Fem6ndez, E. M. 2003. Bilingual Sentence Processing: Rel- ative Clause Attachment in English and Spanish. Amster- dam: John Benjamins.
  • 10Feru6ndez, C. 2008. "Reexamining the role of explicit infor- mation in processing instruction". Studies in Second Lan- guage Acquisition 30,277 -305.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2006a. Grammatical processing in language learners [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 3-42.
  • 2Clahsen, H. &C. Felser. 2006b. Continuity and shallow structures in language processing [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics 27:107-126.
  • 3Dussias, P. 2003. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in second language learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 529- 557.
  • 4Felser, C. & L. Roberts. 2007. Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study [J]. Second Language Research 23: 9-36.
  • 5Gibson, E. & T. Warren. 2004. Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies [J]. Syntax 7: 55-78.
  • 6Juffs, A. 1998. Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing [J]. Language Learning 48: 107-147.
  • 7Juffs, A. 2005. The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language [J]. Second Language Research 21:121-151.
  • 8Just, M., P. Carpenter &J. Woolley. 1982. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3: 228-238.
  • 9Lee, M.-W. 2004. Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar) [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33:51- 73.
  • 10Marinis, T., L. Roberts, C. Felser & H. Clahsen. 2005. Gaps in second language sentence processing [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 53-78.

共引文献32

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部