期刊文献+

兔腭裂术后黏膜瘢痕生物力学性质研究

Study of biomechanical properties of mucosa scars after cleft palate surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究兔正常腭黏膜及黏膜瘢痕的生物力学性质,及其应力与应变的关系。方法建立兔腭裂实验模型,实验组于腭黏膜瘢痕明显的部位切取宽2—3mm、长约15mm的黏膜瘢痕,对照组于相同部位切取同样大小的正常腭黏膜,于加载测试仪上做拉伸实验。结果瘢痕和正常黏膜的弹性模量分别为(24.22±1.31)MPa和(3.32±0.94)MPa,泊松比为0.49,黏膜瘢痕具有较高的弹性模量和强度,而正常黏膜的弹性模量和抗拉强度都有所下降,但瘢痕和正常黏膜的泊松比分别为(0.5±0.06)和(0.49±0.02),显示了生物活体材料的不可压缩性。结论腭裂术后黏膜瘢痕生物力学性质研究,可为临床腭裂继发上颌发育不全正颌、正畸及牵引成骨治疗提供生物力学指导。 Objective To explore biomechanical properties and stress-strain of mucosa scars after cleft palate surgery. Methods After the model of mucosa scars was made, the mucosa scars and normal mucosa were excised and examined immediately by tensionometry. Results The mucosa scars after cleft palate surgery were compared with normal mucosa. The Poisson' s ratio of mucosa scars and normal mucosa was 0. 5 and 0. 49, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups. The ultimate Young' s modulus of mucosa scars was about 24.22 MPa, however, it declined to 3.32 Mpa in normal mucosa. Conclusions The mucosa scars after cleft palate surgery are biomechanically weaker than normal mucosa. It can be used for further research, such as maxillary orthognathic surgery, distraction osteogenesis, and orthodontic treatment.
出处 《中华整形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期453-456,共4页 Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金(09KZ47)
关键词 腭裂 生物力学 瘢痕 Cleft palate Biomechanics Cicatrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kang YL, Zhang ZF, Wang HW, et al., Experimental investigations of the effect of thickness on fracture toughness of metallic foils. Mater Sci Eng A, 2005, 39 : 312-319.
  • 2Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW. Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Germany: Springer, 2009.
  • 3Zhang DS, Eggleton CD, Arola DD. Evaluating the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue using digital image correlation. Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 42: 409-416.
  • 4Cheng T, Dai C, Gan RZ. Viscoelastic properties of human tympanic membrane. AnnBiomed Eng, 2007, 35: 305-314.
  • 5Szabo ME, Taylor M, Thurner PJ. Mechanical properties of single bovine trabeculae are unaffected by strain rate. J Biomech, 2011, 44: 962-967.
  • 6Dickinson AS, Taylor AC, Browne M. The influence of acetabular cup material on pelvis cortex surface strains, measured using digital image correlation. J Biomech, 2012, 45: 719-723.
  • 7王志勇,石冰,鲁大为,宋庆高.颊、腭粘膜移植修复硬腭裸露骨面的组织学观察[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2002,20(5):326-329. 被引量:12
  • 8Ross RB. The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J, 1970, 7:37-47.
  • 9Cerda E. Mechanics of scars. J Biomech, 2005, 38:1598-1603.
  • 10Edwards C, Marks R. Evaluation of biomechanical propeities of human skin. Clin Dermatol, 1995, 13:375-80.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]Kremenak CR, Huffaman WC, Olin WH. Growth of maxillae after palatal surgery. Cleft Palate J, 1970,7(7):716~719
  • 2[2]Ross RB. Treatment variable affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (part I): Treatment affecting growth. Cleft Palate J, 1987,24(1):5~23
  • 3[3]Wijdeveld MGMM, Maltha JC, Grupping EM, et al. A histological study of tissue response to simulated cleft palate surgery at different ages in beagle dogs. Arch Oral Boil,1991,36(11):837~843
  • 4[4]Gima H, Sunakawa H, Arakaki K, et al, A histological study on healing process of palate wound with bone denudation. J Jpn Cleft Palate Assoc,1998,23(3):214~225
  • 5[5]Rails ZA, Rails HM. A simple method for demonstration of osteoid in paraffin section. Med Lab Thechnol,1975,32(3):203~231
  • 6[6]Siegel MI, Mooney MP. Appropriate animal models for craniofacial biology. Cleft Palate J,1990,27(1):18~25
  • 7[7]Bardach J, Kelly KM. Dose interference with mucoperiosteum and palatal bone affect maxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1991,88(4):545~548
  • 8[8]Rudolph R. Inhibition of myofibroblast by skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg,1979,63(4):473~480

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部