期刊文献+

Characteristics of Photosystem Ⅱ Behavior in Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) Bract and Capsule Wall 被引量:4

Characteristics of Photosystem Ⅱ Behavior in Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) Bract and Capsule Wall
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Though bract and capsule wall of boll in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have different photosynthetic capacities, the features of photosystem II (PS II) in these organs are scarce. In this paper, chlorophyll a lfuorescence emission was measured to investigate the difference in the photosynthetic apparatus of dark-acclimated (JIP-test) and light-acclimated (light-saturation pulse method) bract and capsule wall. Compared with leaves, the oxygen evolving system of non-foliar organs had lower efifciency. The pool size of PS II electron acceptor of non-foliar organs was small, and the photochemical activity of leaves was higher than that of the bract and capsule wall. In regard to the photosystem I (PS I) electron acceptor side, the pool size of end electron acceptors of leaves was larger, and the quantum yield of electron transport from QA (PS II primary plastoquinone acceptor) further than the PS I electron acceptors of leaves was higher than that of bract and capsule wall. In all green organs, the actual quantum yield of photochemistry decreased with light. The thermal dissipation fraction of light absorbed by the PS II antennae was the highest in bract and the lowest in capsule wall relative to leaves. Compared with leaves, capsule wall was characterized by less constitutive thermal dissipation and via dissipation as lfuorescence emission. These results suggested that lower PS II photochemical activity in non-foliar organs may be result from limitations at the donor side of PS II and the acceptor sides of both photosystems. Though bract and capsule wall of boll in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have different photosynthetic capacities, the features of photosystem II (PS II) in these organs are scarce. In this paper, chlorophyll a lfuorescence emission was measured to investigate the difference in the photosynthetic apparatus of dark-acclimated (JIP-test) and light-acclimated (light-saturation pulse method) bract and capsule wall. Compared with leaves, the oxygen evolving system of non-foliar organs had lower efifciency. The pool size of PS II electron acceptor of non-foliar organs was small, and the photochemical activity of leaves was higher than that of the bract and capsule wall. In regard to the photosystem I (PS I) electron acceptor side, the pool size of end electron acceptors of leaves was larger, and the quantum yield of electron transport from QA (PS II primary plastoquinone acceptor) further than the PS I electron acceptors of leaves was higher than that of bract and capsule wall. In all green organs, the actual quantum yield of photochemistry decreased with light. The thermal dissipation fraction of light absorbed by the PS II antennae was the highest in bract and the lowest in capsule wall relative to leaves. Compared with leaves, capsule wall was characterized by less constitutive thermal dissipation and via dissipation as lfuorescence emission. These results suggested that lower PS II photochemical activity in non-foliar organs may be result from limitations at the donor side of PS II and the acceptor sides of both photosystems.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第11期2056-2064,共9页 农业科学学报(英文版)
基金 financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1203283 31260295) the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China(2007BAD44B07) the Special Launching Funds for High-Level Talents of Shihezi University China (RCZX201005)
关键词 COTTON non-foliar PHOTOSYNTHESIS chlorophyll fluorescence JIP-TEST cotton, non-foliar, photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, JIP-test
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Aschan G, Pfanz H, Vodnik D, Batiè F. 2005. Photosyntheticperformance of vegetative and reproductive structuresof green hellebore (Helleborus viridis L. agg.).Photosynthetica, 43, 55-64.
  • 2Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M 2000. Comparativeepidermal ultrastructure of cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) leaf, bract and capsule wall. Annals of Botany, 86,1143-1152.
  • 3Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M, Wullschleger S D, Kim KS, Harris W. 1994. Anatomical considerations related tophotosynthesis in cotton (Cossypium hirsutum L.) leaves,bracts, and the capsule wall. Journal of ExperimentalBotany, 45, 111-118.
  • 4Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M. 2003. Morphometricanalysis of chloroplasts of cotton and fruiting organs.Biologia Plantarum, 47, 281-284.
  • 5Constable G A, Rawson H M. 1980. Carbon production andutilization in cotton: Inferences from a carbon budget.Functional Plant Biology, 7, 539-553.
  • 6Elmore C D. 1973. Contributions of the capsule wall andbracts to the developing cotton fruit. Crop Science, 13,751-752.
  • 7Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. 1989. The relationshipbetween the quantum yield of photosynthetic electrontransport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 990, 87-92.
  • 8Hendrickson L, Furbank R T, Chow W S. 2004. Asimple alternative approach to assessing the fate ofabsorbed light energy using chlorophyll fluorescence.Photosynthesis Research, 82, 73-81.
  • 9Hetherington S, Smillie R M, Davies W J . 1998.Photosynthetic activities of vegetative and fruitingtissues of tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 49,1173-1181.
  • 10Hu YY, Zhang Y L, Luo H H, Li W, Oguchi R, Fan D Y,Chow W S, Zhang W F. 2012. Important photosyntheticcontribution from the non-foliar green organs in cottonat the late growth stage. Planta, 235, 325-336.

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部