期刊文献+

专业护理实践行为测评工具中文版信效度研究 被引量:5

Research in reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nursing activities scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对护理行为量表(NursingActivitiesScale,NAS)进行翻译,并分析翻译后的中文版量表的信、效度。方法采用方便抽样抽取520名三甲医院护士作为调查对象,运用SPSS17.0和AMOSl7.0进行统计分析。结果中文版NAS量表各条目与量表总分的相关系数值为0.232~0.732(P〈0.01)。探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为52.251%;验证性因子分析的各项拟合指数为x2/df=1.145、GFI=0.962、AGFI=0.933、RMR=0.028、RMSEA=0.017、NFI=0.957、CFI=0.994,均在可接受范围内,适配良好。结论中文版NAS信度、效度良好,可用于我国护士专业护理实践行为的评估。 Objective To translate the English version of Nursing Activities Scale (NAS) into Chinese, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of NAS. Methods A total of 520 nurses were tested by the Chinese version of NAS. SPSS17.0 and AMOS 17.0 were used to test the reliability and validity. Results The correlations between the items and total scale ranged from 0.232 to 0.732(P〈0.01). Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and they could explain 52.251% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit, and the fit indices were x2/df = 1.145, GFI = 0.962, AGFI = 0.933, RMR =0.028,RMSEA=0.017,NFI=0.957,CFI=0.994. Conclusion Chinese version of NAS is reliable and valid,
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1044-1046,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJCZHI12)
关键词 专业护理实践行为 护士 量表 信度 效度 Professional nursing practice behavior Nurse Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献91

共引文献1123

同被引文献59

  • 1Wang SS,Liu YH.Impact of professional nursing practice environment and psychological empowerment on nurses' work engagement:test of structural equation modeling[J].J Nurs Manag,2013,23(9):12124.
  • 2Kim TY,Aryee S,Loi R,et al.Person-organization fit and employee outcomes:test of a social exchange model[J].Int J Huma Resou Manag,2013,24(19):3719-3737.
  • 3Chi NW,Pan SY.A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance:the mediating roles of perceived person-job fit and person-organization fit[J].J Bus Psycho1,2012,27(1):43-56.
  • 4Kelly K,Waltz CF,Jenkins LS.The nursing activity scale:measurement of nursing outcomes,measuring nursing performance in practice[M].New York:Springer Publishing,2001:25 3-261.
  • 5Wesley A,Scroggings BA.Selection meaningful work and employee retention:a self-concept based approach to person-job fit[D].New Mexico State:New Mexico State University,2003.
  • 6Hinami K,Whelan CT,Miller JA,et al.Person-job fit:an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of hospitalists[J].J Hosp Med,2013,8(2):96-101.
  • 7Antonio P,Gutierrez AP,Candela LL,et al.The structural relationships between organizational commitment,global job satisfaction,developmental experiences,work values,organizational support,and person-organization fit among nursing faculty[J].J Adv Nurs,2013,68(7):1601-1614.
  • 8Merecz D,Andysz A.Relationship between person-organization fit and objective and subjective health status[J].Int J Occup Med Environ Health,2012,25(2):166-177.
  • 9Swider BW,Boswell WR,Zimmerman RD.Examining the job search-turnover relationship:the role of embeddedness,job satisfaction,and available alternatives[J].J Appl Psychol,2011,96(2):432-441.
  • 10Alnia(c)ika E,Alnia(c)ika U,Eratb S,et al.Does person-organization fit moderate the effects of affective commitment and job satisfaction on turnover intentions?[J].Proce-Soci Beha Scie,2013,99(6):274-281.

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部