期刊文献+

“新闻自由”与“隐私权利”的权衡——美国最高法院司法判例研究 被引量:1

The Balance Between "Press Freedom" and "Rights of Privacy"——The Study on Supreme Court of United States' Cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 新闻自由是美国宪法明文规定的最为重要公民权利之一,"隐私权利"虽然没有明文出现在宪法文本当中,但也属于公民最为珍爱的权利之一。在当代美国这样一个高度媒介化的社会环境下,究竞该如何权衡两种备受人们钟爱的权利已经成为联邦最高法院最为头疼的议题之一。实际上,这种权衡并没有一种一劳永逸的解决方案,更多的还是最高法院大法官内部不同司法理念甚至是不同党派阵营的相互冲突与妥协。因此,就司法判例而言,最高法院就两种权益的冲突与协调基本采取就事论事的实用主义态度。 This paper mainly discusses the balance of two rights between "press freedom" and "right of privacy" by the Supreme Court of United States cases. The freedom of press is one of the most cherished rights of American citizens according to the first amendment of Constitution of the Untied States. , while the rights of privacy is also deeply beloved by American people. So how to balance the two beloved and contradicted rights is becoming more and more troubled issue for the Court. There does not exist an ideal resolution for this balancing for the Court, so the Court focuses or emphasizes different aspects in terms of different case background.
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期84-89,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 新闻自由 隐私权利 误导性报道 诽谤诉讼 press freedom rights of privacy false light reporting libel lawsuit
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1http. // wiki. answers, corn/Q/Where is the _ right _ to _ privacy.
  • 2Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U. S. 374.
  • 3New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376U. S. 254.
  • 4Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U. S. 130.
  • 5Associated Press v. Walker, 389 U. S. 28.
  • 6Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co. , 419 U. S. 245.
  • 7LloydCorp. v. Tanner, 407 U. S. 551.
  • 8Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U. S. 501.
  • 9Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469.
  • 10Coz Broadcastiny, Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469.

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部