期刊文献+

学习风格与中美大学生课堂学习行为的关系研究 被引量:4

Exploring the Association between Learning Approaches and Classroom Learning Behaviors Presented by Chinese and American Undergraduates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中美学生存在课堂学习行为差异的现象得到了中外众多教育工作者的关注和讨论。本文作者推测,中美学生在学习风格上存在的结构取向和深度取向的差异,是导致他们表现出不同课堂行为反应的一个原因。本研究采用学习风格量表和课堂学习行为量表对281名中国大学生和206名美国大学生施测。数据分析结果表明,中美学生存在学习风格与课堂学习行为的显著差异;学习风格的结构取向与课堂学习行为呈显著负相关,深度取向与课堂学习行为呈显著正相关;结构取向的学习风格在文化组别与课堂学习行为之间存在部分中介作用,表明结构取向至少能部分地解释中美大学生之间的课堂学习行为差异。 Currently, the phenomenon that American and Chi- nese students present different behavioral traits in the classroom has been intensively discussed. The present study hypothesized that Chinese and Ameri- can students differ in the tendency of assuming a structure - oriented or a depth - oriented approach to learning, and their tendencies in learning approaches at least partly explain their behavioral differences in the classroom. Two measures assessing learning ap- proaches and classroom learning behaviors were im- plemented to 281 Chinese undergraduates and 206 American undergraduates. The results indicated that American and Chinese students differed significantly on the learning behavior measure and on the learning approach measure, the structure - oriented learning approach was negatively and significantly related to classroom learning behavior, the depth -oriented learning approach was positively and significantly re- lated to classroom learning behavior, and the struc- ture- oriented approach partially mediated the rela- tionship between cultural group and classroom learn- ing behavior. It was suggested that the structure - o- riented learning approach at least partially explains the behavioral differences in the classroom presented by Chinese and American students.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2013年第3期239-247,共9页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 教育部人文社科研究项目(11YJC880012) 浙江省钱江人才计划C类项目(QJC1202003) 浙江大学"985工程"三期项目(10508226)
关键词 课堂学习行为 学习风格 认知过程 中美比较研究 classroom learning behavior, learn- ing approach, cognitive processes, cross - cultural companson
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1程宏宇,Heidi Ardrade.思维风格对中美大学生课堂学习行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(3):647-651. 被引量:9
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7533
  • 3Clark, R. , & Gieve, S. N. ( 2006). On the discursive construction of the Chinese learner. Language, Culture and Curriculum,19( 1 ) ,54 - 73.
  • 4Dahlin, B. , & Watkins, D. ( 2000 ). The role of repe- tition in the processes of memorising and under- standing: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70,65 - 84.
  • 5Duffy, S. , & Kitayama, S. ( 2007 ). Mnemonic con- text effect in two cultures: Attention to memory representations. Cognitive science, 31, 1009 - 1020.
  • 6Evans,C. , & Waring, M. (2011). Student teacher assessment feedback preferences:The influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individ- ual Differences ,21 ( 3 ) ,271 - 280.
  • 7Fiorina, L. , Antonietti, A. , Colombo, B. , & Bartolo- meo, A. ( 2007 ). Thinking style, browsing primes and hyperrnedia navigation. Computers & Educa- tion,49,916 - 941.
  • 8Gan, Z. (2009). "Asian learners" re - examined : an empirical study of language learning attitudes, strategies and motivation among mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,30( 1 ) ,41 - 58.
  • 9Hu , G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to ped- agogical imports:The case of communicative lan- guage teaching in China. Language, Culture atut Curriculum,15,93 - 105.
  • 10Huang,J. (2009). What happens when two cultures meet in the classroom? Journal of htstructional Psychology,36 ( 4 ) , 335 - 342.

二级参考文献27

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献7538

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部