期刊文献+

我国上市公司经理人动机对费用粘性影响研究 被引量:7

Impact of Different Manager Incentives on Cost Stickiness in Chinese Public Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以我国2001—2012年持续上市的公司为样本,研究经理人最优决策动机和盈余管理动机两种不同动机对费用粘性的影响。实证研究表明,经理人最优决策动机会导致较高的费用粘性水平;具有保盈动机的样本公司,费用的对称性表现得更明显;而具有新股发行动机的公司,费用表现出反粘性的特征。上述研究厘清了不同经理人动机对费用习性的影响路径,为企业通过费用比率进行经理人绩效考核提供了更为全面的理论指导。 Based on the data of Chinese public companies from 2001 to 2012, this paper studies the impact of manager' s optimal decision incentive and earnings management incentive on cost stickiness. It is found that manager' s optimal deci- sion incentive causes high level of cost stickiness; companies reporting positive earnings exhibit a more symmetric cost be- havior; companies planning new share exhibit cost anti-stickiness. The results help us to understand the paths that different manager incentives influence cost stickiness and provide more comprehensive theoretical supports for companies to evaluate manager' s performance with cost ratio.
作者 李粮 赵息
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期512-518,共7页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基金 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20110032110035) 天津大学自主创新基金资助项目
关键词 经理人 最优决策动机 盈余管理动机 费用粘性 manager optimal decision incentive earnings management incentive cost stickiness
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Anderson M C, Banker R D, Janakiraman S N. Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky" ? [ J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2003,41 ( 1 ) :47-63.
  • 2Chen C X, Lu H. The agency problem, corporate govern- ance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general and administrative costs [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Re- search,2012, 29( 1 ) :252-282.
  • 3Banker R D, Byzalov J M. Plehn-Dujowich Sticky Cost Be- havior[R]. Philadelphia:Temple University,2011.
  • 4Dierynck B, Renders A. Earnings Management Incentives and the Asymmetric Behavior of Labor Costs [ R ]. Leuven : Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,2009.
  • 5Wiersma E. The Impact of the Reward Structure on Sticki- ness [ R ] Amsterdam : VU University Amsterdam,2010.
  • 6Balakrishnan R, Labro E, Soderstrom N S. Cost Structure and Sticky Costs [ R]. Iowa:The University of Iowa,2011.
  • 7Noreen E N, Soderstrom. Are overhead costs strictly propor- tional to activity? [J]. Journal of Accounting and Econom- ics, 1994,17 (1-2) :255-278.
  • 8Kama I, Weiss D. Do Managers' Deliberate Decisions In- duce Sticky Costs? [ R]. Ramat Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 2010.
  • 9Banker R D, Ciftci M, Mashruwala R. The Effect of Prior- Period Changes on Cost Behavior[ R]. Philadelphia: Temple University, 2008.
  • 10Roychowdhury S. Earnings management through real activi- ties manipulation [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Econom- ics,2006,42 ( 3 ) :335-370.

二级参考文献3

共引文献728

同被引文献114

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部