期刊文献+

桐城派与汉宋之争

The Faction of Tongcheng and Han Song Controversy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 汉宋之争,是清代学坛的一椿要案,桐城派与之有着不解之缘。乾隆年间,姚鼐与戴震公开对抗,嘉道年间,方东树与江藩再起波澜,桐城派始终是汉宋之争中宋学派的主要阵营。这既是门户之见使然,更是桐城派尊崇程朱而重治"术"与汉学家尊奉汉学而重治"学"的学术分歧导致的必然结果。嘉道时期的桐城派主张汉宋兼采,表现出开明的学术态度。但是,用汉学之"学"补宋学之"术",汉学为宋学服务,才是他们的最终意图。 Han Song Controversy is a famous academic forum in Qing Dynasty, and the faction of Tongcheng has a close contact with it. Yao Nai and Dai Zhen began the controversy, and Fang Dongshu and Jiang Fan made it more fierce. Tongcheng has always been the main camp of the school of Song. This not only is the sectarianism, but also is the inevitable consequence of the academic differences between the factions of Tongcheng and Han. During the Jiaqing and Daoguang era, the faction of Tongcheng advocated adopting both the scholarships of Tongcheng and Han. However, making Han the faction of serviced for the faction of Song is their ultimate intention.
作者 霍省瑞
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2013年第5期84-89,共6页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(项目批准号:08JJD840200) 四川省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目(项目批准号:13SB0201)
关键词 桐城派 汉学 汉宋之争 汉宋兼采 the faction of Tongcheng the faction of Song Han Song Controversy adopting both the scholarships of Han and Song
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1刘师培.《近代汉学变迁论》[J].国粹学报,1907,(31).
  • 2王达敏.从尊宋到崇汉——论姚鼐建立桐城派时清廷学术宗尚的潜移[J].中国文化,2002(19):279-293. 被引量:5
  • 3戴震.戴震集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980..
  • 4姚鼐.惜抱轩诗文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
  • 5江藩.汉学师承记(外二种)[M].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
  • 6方东树.考椠集文录[M].清光绪二十年刻本.
  • 7[美]艾尔曼 赵刚译.从理学到朴学-中华帝国晚期思想与社会变化面面观[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1995..
  • 8管同.因寄轩文集[M].道光十三年刻本.
  • 9刘开.刘孟涂集[M].道光六年刊本.
  • 10姚莹.中复堂全集·遗稿[M]//近代中国史料丛刊续编(第6集).台北:文海出版社,1984.

共引文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部