摘要
在侵权法中允许受害人在符合法定条件下要求精神损害赔偿,无论是大陆法系和英美法系各国法律及学理上均不持异议,我国也有学者指出,精神损害赔偿是侵权责任法中的一种责任方式①。违约之诉中是否允许精神损害赔偿仍是一个争议的问题,本文运用比较的分析方法对此予以分析。
In "Tort Law", victims are allowed to claim compensation for moral damage under the conditions of compliance with the statutory. Neither the Civil law nor the Anglo-American law has objections theoretically. Chinese scholars also proposed that compensation for moral damage was a responsibility measure in "Tort Law". It is still a controversial issue whether the compensation for moral damage should be allowed. This paper analyzes the issue in comparative analysis method.
出处
《价值工程》
2013年第34期307-308,共2页
Value Engineering
关键词
违约
精神损害赔偿
旅游合同
breach of contract
compensation for moral damage
travel contract