循证护理和常规护理对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的效果对比

Effect Comparison of Evidence-based Nursing and Routine Nursing for The Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

目的:对比分析循证护理和常规护理对预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的效果。方法:选择2011年1月-2013年3月笔者所在医院接诊的120例进行呼吸机治疗的患者进行研究,采用随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组各60例。其中对照组采用常规护理防范,试验组采用循证护理方法。观察两组患者的械通气时间和VAP发生率,并进行对比分析。结果:试验组患者的通气时间明显短于对照组,且VAP发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:循证护理用于进行呼吸机治疗的患者,可显著缩短通气时间,降低呼吸相关性肺炎的发生率。

[ Abstract ] Objective： To compare the efficacy of evidence-based nursing and routine nursing for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Method： 120 cases of patients treated by breathing machine in our hospital, which were selected in our hospital from January 2011 to March 2013.They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, 60 cases in each group.The control g^oup were taken routine nursing, and the experimental group were taken evidence-based nursing.The machinery ventilation time and the incidence of VAP of tWo groups were compared and analyzed.Result： The machine~ ventilation time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than the control group, and the incidence of VAP of the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group（P〈O.01）.Conclusion： Evidence-based nursing for patients which were treated by breathing machine, can obviously shorten the machinery ventilation time and reduce the incidence of pneumonia.