期刊文献+

边缘率标线长度对减速行为的影响现象和机理研究 被引量:15

Research on Speed Reduction Phenomenon and Mechanism Influenced by Length of Edge Rate Bars
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探寻路面边缘率标线长度对驾驶员减速行为的影响现象和作用机理,在高速公路直线段开展路上实证研究。采集试验路段自由流车辆的断面车速数据,统计分析边缘率标线长度对减速行为的影响现象。最后,运用结构方程模型(SEM)探索影响机理。结果表明,长度的减小能够显著增强边缘率标线减速效果,当边缘率标线长度分别取1.5,1和0.5 m时,平均车速与铺设前相比分别降低5.0%,7.1%和8.8%;边缘率标线长度从标线扩张率和视觉暂留2个角度影响驾驶员的减速行为;边缘率标线长度的减小与时间频率的增大能够协同地增强驾驶员的减速行为。 Road experiments were carried out on freeway to study the influence of length of edge rate bars on driver's reduction behavior of length. Free flow speed data were collected. And data were analyzed by using SEM. The result shows that speed reduction was enhanced with loss in length. Average speed reduced by 5.0% , 7.1% and 8.8% when length was 1.5, 1 and 0.5 m respectively, that length influences reduction behavior through expansion rate and visual staying, and that reduction behavior was influenced synergistically by loss in length and increase in temporal frequency.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期114-120,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(50778142 51078299) 交通运输部联合科技联合攻关项目(2010353342240)
关键词 交通安全 边缘率标线长度 结构方程模型(SEM) 减速效果 视觉暂留 扩张率 时间频率 traffic safety length of edge rate bars structural equation model (SEM) speed reduction behavior visual staying phenomenon expansion rate temporal frequency
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Denton Gordon G. The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed[J]. Perception, 1980, 9(4):393 -402.
  • 2Richard A Retting, Hugh W McGee, Charles M Farmer. Influence of experimental pavement markings on urban freeway exit-ramp traffic speeds [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000, 1 705(1) :116 - 121.
  • 3Rakha H A, Katz B J, Duke D. Design and evaluation of peripheral transverse bars to reduce vehicle speeds[ C]. TRB Annual Meeting CD-ROM, 2006 : 1 - 14.
  • 4Josh R, Johannes M Z. What determines the perceived speed of dots moving within apertures c? [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2001, 141(1): 79-87.
  • 5Sbastien G, Peggy S, Yves F, et al. Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: psychophysical evidence[J]. Vision Research, 2002, 42(25):2 757 -2 772.
  • 6王晓丽,李西营,邵景进.形成性测量模型:结构方程模型的新视角[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):293-300. 被引量:20
  • 7David Carmel, Pascal Saker, Geraint Rees, et al. Perceptual load modulates conscious flicker perception[J]. Journal of Vision, 2007,7(4) : 1 -12.
  • 8Larish J F, Flash J M. Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990, 16(2): 295 -302.
  • 9Whitney D, Westwood D A, Goodal M A. The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to stationary object[J]. Nature, 2003, 423(6942): 869-872.
  • 10Anderson G J, Cineros J. Speed, size and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events[J]. Journal of Exper- imental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1999, 25 (1):256 -269.

二级参考文献58

  • 1薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2009:330.
  • 2邱林 郑雪.主观幸福感的结构及其与人格特质的关系.中国健康心理学杂志,2006,(4).
  • 3Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 229-237.
  • 4Baxter, R. (2009). Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: a commentary essay. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1370-1377.
  • 5Blalock, H. M. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • 6Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • 7Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 305-314.
  • 8Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5, 3-22.
  • 9Bollen, K. A. (2007). Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 219-228.
  • 10Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009). Causal indicator models: identification, estimation, and testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 498-522.

共引文献55

同被引文献117

引证文献15

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部