期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

支架影像增强显影技术在冠状动脉置入支架可视性及球囊后扩张必要性评价中的应用 被引量：5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨支架影像增强显影技术(SB)在冠状动脉置入支架可视性和球囊后扩张必要性评价中的指导作用。方法行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术并置入支架的冠心病患者102例。通过标准的冠状动脉造影(CA)和SB对支架可视性进行评价,并进行积分评价(1分为差,2分为可,3分为良,4分为优)。经CA定量分析、SB对球囊后扩张的必要性进行评价(球囊后扩张必要性:0为支架贴壁良好不需要后扩张;1为支架贴壁可,不需要后扩张;2为支架贴壁不良,需要后扩张)。结果 CA显示支架可视性为(2.03±0.84)分(其中1分44例,2分71例,3分33例,4分8例),SB显示支架可视性为(2.79±0.84)分(其中1分14例,2分32例,3分82例,4分28例),两者相比,P<0.05。根据CA定量分析结果拟行球囊后扩张31例,根据SB评价结果实际行球囊后扩张48例,两者相比,P<0.01。结论 SB可明显提高冠状动脉置入支架的可视性,有效指导球囊后扩张。
作者 胡喜田 李子莉 薛铮 王维刚 李丽红 吕新湖
机构地区 石家庄市第一医院
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2013年第43期52-53,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
基金 河北省科技厅2012年度重点科技支撑计划项目(12276104D-53)
关键词 冠状动脉性心脏病 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 冠状动脉支架置入术 支架球囊后扩张 冠状动脉造影 支架增强显影技术
分类号 R541.4 [医药卫生—心血管疾病]
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MR Penn I, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronaryartery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 496-501.
  • 2Serruys PW, Ong AT, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier JJ, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coil Cardiol 2005; 46: 575-581.
  • 3Fujii K, Mintz GS, Kobayashi Y, Carlier SG, Takebayashi H, Yasuda T, et al. Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Circulation 2004; 109: 1085-1088.
  • 4de Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, Serruys PW. Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1999; 100: 1777-1783.
  • 5Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. ACC clinical expert consensus document on standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Committee to Develop a Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS)). J Am Coil Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1478-1492.
  • 6Koolen JJ, van het Veer M, Hanekamp CE. StentBoost image enhancement: first clinical experience. Medicamundi 2005; 49: 1-6.
  • 7Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB III, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). Circulation 2006; 113: 156-175.
  • 8Serruys PW, Reiber JH, Wijns W, van den Brand M, Kooijman CJ, ten Katen HJ, et al. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 482-488.
  • 9Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Degertekin M, Grube E, Guagliumi G Urbaszek W, et al. Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial. Circulation 2005; 111:900-905.
  • 10Rogers PK, Michaels AD. Enhanced X-ray visualization of coronary stents: clinical aspects. Cardiol Clin 2009; 27: 467-475.

共引文献9

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

山东医药
2013年 第43期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部