期刊文献+

从实证主义到社会建构主义:科学教师课堂提问行为研究范式的转换 被引量:4

From Positivism to Social Constructivism:The Transformation of Research Paradigm on Science Teachers' Questioning Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学教师提问行为研究一直过于依赖实证主义,其研究范式本身存在局限。当前,社会建构主义研究范式受到越来越多的研究者的青睐,其优势主要体现在三个方面:教师提问目的指向促进学生概念转变;打破严格的传统分类标准,考虑提问情境和学生的实际;学生和教师作为研究的真正参与者,而不仅仅是研究对象。这种研究范式的转移对科学教师提问行为研究提出了新的挑战与要求。 Most studies on science teacher's questioning behavior have been heavily dependent on the paradigm of positivism and the research paradigm has limitations itself. More and more researchers begin to favor social constructivism paradigm,the advantages are mainly reflected on three aspects as follows:the purpose of teacher's questioning pointing to promote students conceptual change,breaking away from the traditional classification on questioning and considering the context and student,teachers and students are participants of the research but not just as the object of study. The shift of research paradigm presents greater challenges and requirements to the research of science teacher's questioning behavior.
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期12-18,共7页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 科学教师 课堂提问 研究范式 实证主义 社会建构主义 science teacher questioning of class teaching research paradigm positivism social constructivism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Christine C..Teacher Questioning in Science Classroom:approaches that stimulate produc- tive thinking [J]. journal of research teaching in science teaching, 2007,44(6):815-843.
  • 2Redfield, Doris L. & Rousseau,Elaine Waldman. A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Re- search on Teacher Questioning Behavior [ J ]. Review of Educational Research, 1981,51 (2) : 237-245.
  • 3邱道骥,孟献华.初中化学课堂教师提问的实证分析及其教学启示[J].化学教育,2009,30(10):36-39. 被引量:11
  • 4Yang, Mikyeong. A Critical Review of Research on Questioning in Education: Limitations of Its Positivistic Basis [J]. Asia Pacific Education Review,2006,7(2) : 195-204.
  • 5Winne,Philip H.. Experiments Relating Teachers" Use of Higher Cognitive Questions to Stu- dent Achievement [J]. Review of Educational Research, 1979,49( 1 ) : 13-50.
  • 6Yan Yip,Din. Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction [J]. Journal of Biological Education ( Society of Biology ), 2004,38 (2) : 76-83.
  • 7Smith, Edward L., Blakeslee, Theron D. & Anderson, Charles W.. Teaching strategies associat- ed with conceptual change learning in Science [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993,30 (2):111-126.
  • 8Carlsen W.. Questioning in Classrooms :A Sociolinguistic Perspective [J].Review of Educa- tional Research, 1991,61 (2) : 157-178.
  • 9Alandeom W.. Oliveira Improving Teacher Questioning in Science Inquiry Discussions Through Professional Development [J ].Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2010,47 (4) : 422-453.
  • 10卢正芝,洪松舟.教师有效课堂提问:价值取向与标准建构[J].教育研究,2010,31(4):65-70. 被引量:210

二级参考文献8

  • 1孟献华,李广洲.基于析因实验方法的探究活动设计与实践[J].化学教学,2004(11):23-25. 被引量:9
  • 2Thomas L Good,Jere E Brophy.陶志琼等译.透视课堂.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002:7398.
  • 3加里·D·鲍里奇.易东平译.有效教学方法.南京:江苏教育出版社,2002:213.
  • 4付道春.教学行为的原理与技术.北京:教育科学出版社,2001:65-77.
  • 5Ur. Penny. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. 1996.29.
  • 6加里·D.鲍里奇.有效教学方法(第四版)[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2002.209.
  • 7Dale Hoskisson. The Value Question [EB/OL].http://cwd. dhemery.com/2003/06/the_value_question/.
  • 8克莱因擞师能力标准-面对面、在线及混合隋境[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.10-35.

共引文献218

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部