渎职犯罪罪数相关问题探析——兼评《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)》

Research on the Quantity of the Crime of Malfeasance:Comment on “Interpretation for the Law Applicable to the Crime of Malfeasance(1)”

"两高"颁布的《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)》关于渎职罪罪数问题的规定,具有合理性。当某一行为同时符合普通法条和特别法条的规定,但是依照特别法条所确定的法定刑却明显低于依照普通法条所确定的法定刑的,除非法律明确规定适用普通法条,否则不能以不符合罪刑相适应为原则放弃适用特别法条。当某一行为不符合特别法条所规定的定罪要件,却符合普通法条的构成要件的,可以适用普通法条。

The Interpretation of the Supreme People＇s Court and the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Criminal Cases In- volving Malfeasance in Office （I） has its reasonability on the crime quantity problem, which was issued jointly by Supreme People＇s Court and Supreme People＇s Procuratorate and usually briefed as ＂two Supreme interpretation＂ in practice. When an act meets the both requirements of a general provision and a special provision and the statutory sentence specified by the special pro- vision shows more lenient than that of the general provision, unless the statute judges the general provision prevails, the special provision should apply and cannot be circumvented by using the Penalty- Fit- for- Crime principle. While when an act is only exposed to a general provision but not a special provision, the general provision should apply.