期刊文献+

带不等式路径约束最优控制问题的惩罚函数法 被引量:12

A Penalty Method for Solving Inequality Path Constrained Optimal Control Problems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 控制变量参数化(Control variable parameterization,CVP)方法是目前求解流程工业中最优操作问题的主流数值方法,但如果问题中包含路径约束,特别是不等式路径约束时,CVP方法则需要考虑专门的处理手段.为了克服该缺点,本文提出一种基于L1精确惩罚函数的方法,能够有效处理关于控制变量、状态变量、甚至控制变量/状态变量复杂耦合形式下的不等式路径约束.此外,为了能使用基于梯度的成熟优化算法,本文还引进了最新出现的光滑化技巧对非光滑的惩罚项进行磨光.最终得到了能高效处理不等式路径约束的改进型CVP架构,并给出相应数值算法.经典的带不等式路径约束最优控制问题上的测试结果及与国外文献报道的比较研究表明:本文所提出的改进型CVP架构及相应算法在精度和效率上兼有良好表现. Control variable parameterization (CVP) method is currently popular for solving optimal control problems in process industries. However, dealing with path constraints is difficult in the framework of CVP method, especially for inequality path constraints. In order to conquer this flaw, this paper introduces the L1 exact penalty function from the mathematical programming into the field of optimal control so as to incorporate all the inequality path constraints into the original objective function. Besides, in order to use sophisticated gradient-based optimization algorithms, a novel smoothing technique is introduced to make the penalty terms differentiable. In this way, an enhanced CVP implementation structure which can handle inequality path constraints efficiently and a concomitant algorithm are proposed. Classic optimal control problems with path constraints are illustrated. Compared with the results by previous researchers, the results obtained in this paper demonstrate marked advantages in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
出处 《自动化学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期1996-2001,共6页 Acta Automatica Sinica
基金 国家863计划项目(2006AA05Z226) 国家自然科学基金(U1162130) 浙江省杰出青年科学基金项目(R4100133)资助~~
关键词 流程工业 最优控制 控制变量参数化 不等式路径约束 惩罚函数 CIMS, optimal control, control variable parameterization, inequality path constraint, penalty function
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Grossmann I E, Biegler L T. Future perspective on optimization. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2004, 28(8): 1193-1218.
  • 2Kirk D E. Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction. New Your: Dover Publications, 2004. 464.
  • 3Bell M L, Sargent R W H. Optimal control of inequality constrained DAE systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2000, 24(11): 2385-2404.
  • 4Bloss K F, Biegler L T, Schiesser W E. Dynamic process optimization through adjoint formulations and constraint aggregation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999, 38(2): 421-432.
  • 5Feehery W F. Dynamic Optimization with Path Constraints[Ph.D. dissertation] , MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
  • 6Luus R. Handling inequality constraints in optimal control by problem reformulation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(21): 9622-9630.
  • 7Chen T W C, Vassiliadis V S. Inequality path constraints in optimal control: a finite iteration ε-convergent scheme based on pointwise discretization. Journal of Process Control, 2005, 15(3): 353-362.
  • 8Biegler L T. Nonlinear Programming: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications to Chemical Processes. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2010. 415.
  • 9Bryson A E, Ho Y C. Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control. Florence: Taylor and Francis, 1975. 496.
  • 10Fiacco A V, McCormick G P. Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial Mathematics, 1990. 437.

同被引文献94

引证文献12

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部