期刊文献+

3D DCE-MRA对头颈部动脉狭窄的临床价值 被引量:1

Clinical value of head and neck artery stenosis by 3DDCE-MRA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价三维动态增强磁共振血管成像(3D DCE-MRA)显示头颈部血管情况并与数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果对照,探讨3D DCE-MRA在头颈部动脉狭窄的临床应用价值。方法:有头颈部血管狭窄病变的50例病人进行3D DCE-MRA检查,采用K空间中心优先采集技术,3D FLASH序列进行扫描,扫描范围自颅顶至主动脉弓。获得满意的头颈部任意位置任意角度的三维动脉血管像。结果:与DSA比较3D DCEMRA诊断头颈部血管狭窄>50%的敏感性和特异性分别为97.88%和97.83%,与DSA比较有较好一致性,但3D DCEMRA存在过高估计血管狭窄程度。结论:三维动态增强磁共振血管成像(3D DCEMRA)是一种无创、无辐射、便宜的血管成像方法。 Objective:To evaluate 3 D dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3 D DCE -MRA )show blood ves- sels of head and neck, and compare it with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)and discuss the value of clinical application of 3D DCEMRA on vascular disease of head and neck. Methods:Fifty patients suspected of having blood vessel diseases under went 3D DCE - MRA, K - space center priority collection technology and 3D FLASH sequence was pedbrmed. The satisfying 3D arterial image of head and neck in any position or arbitrary angle was obtained through 3D MIP resconstrction of the subtraction images. Results:3DCEMRA and DSA, comparing the evaluation of head and neck hemal stricture degree. Compared with DSA, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stricture ( 〉 50% ) were 97.88% and 97.83%. Conclusion:Compared with DSA, 3D DCE - MRA might be a method of noninvasive, no radiation, cheap in the evaluation of the neck and proximal intracranial vascular.
作者 蔡龙波
机构地区 吉林市中心医院
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2013年第12期37-38,共2页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词 三维增强磁共振血管成像技术 数字减影血管造影 头颈部血管 Three diamensions -contrast enhanced - magnetic resonance angio graphy(3 DDCE -MRA) , Digital subtraction angiog-:aohv (DSA') :Head and neck vessels
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

共引文献11

同被引文献14

  • 1余元新,梁长虹,张忠林,谢淑飞,刘于宝,唐向周.多层螺旋CT肾动脉成像的图像后处理技术及临床应用[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2005,14(2):96-98. 被引量:26
  • 2李清海,严福华,颜志平,徐鹏举,侯君.16层螺旋CT肾脏皮质早期扫描及CTA在肾癌诊断和术前评估中的价值[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2006,12(4):256-260. 被引量:19
  • 3Abuagla EM and Pei TS. Utility of color doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis in comparison with contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Satldi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 2014, 25 (2): 309-315.
  • 4Zelier T, Macharizina R, Rastan A, et al. Renal arterystenosis: Up-date on diagnosis and treatment[J]. Vasa, 2014, 43(1): 27-38.
  • 5Pucci G, Battista F, Lazzari L, et al. Progression of renal artery stenosis after renal denervation[J].Circ J, 2014, 78(3): 767-768.
  • 6Cooper CJ,Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, et al. Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis[J].N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(1): 13-22.
  • 7Philip F, Gornik HL, Rajeswaran J,et al. The impact of renal artery stenosis on outcomes after open-heart surgery[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2014,63(4): 310-316.
  • 8Cheng L, Jing S, Zhang Y. A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography[J].Exp Tber Med, 2013. 5(3): 969-971.
  • 9Vogt FM, Theysohn JM, Michna D, et al. Contrast-enhanced time- resolved 4D MRA of congenital heart and vessel anomalies: image quality and diagnostic value compared with 3D 54RA[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013 23(9): 2392- 2404.
  • 10Merrem AD, Z?liner FG, Reich M, et al.A variational approach to ialage registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the human kidney[J].Magn Reson Imaging 2013, 31 (5): 771-777.

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部