期刊文献+

不同碳排放权分配方案下各国减排成本的比较 被引量:12

Comparative Study of Countries' Abatement Costs Under Different Carbon Emission Rights Allocation Schemes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过碳税线性插值,从全球变化评估模型获取动态CO2边际减排成本曲线(MACs)。以此CO2MACs为工具,对国际社会12种典型碳排放权分配方案下2010-2050年间减排成本进行了测算和比较。本文考虑了一个完全竞争的碳排放权交易市场,以减排成本最小化为目标,研究结果表明:随着全球减排目标的不断提高,排放许可的价格迅速增长,但无论分配方案和全球减排目标如何,全球总减排成本占GDP比重均将在2040年达峰值;由于减排义务、MACs和GDP水平不同,各区域减排成本占GDP比重存在很大差别,分配方案是决定区域成本及其分布的最重要因素。相比发达国家,发展中国家的减排成本更显著地受到方案选择的影响;全球排放路径的选取不改变不同区域在给定方案下减排成本占比的排序,同时,它也不改变给定区域在不同方案下所需承担减排成本的相对大小;在10种方案下,中国在2010-2050年间的减排成本基本稳定在GDP的0.5%左右。 This paper derives the dynamic marginal abatement cost curves (MACs) of CO-2 from the Global Change Assessment Model through the linear interpolation of carbon tax. Taking these CO2 MACs as the tool, abatement costs in the period of 2010 -2050 are calculated and compared under 12 typical carhnn emission rights allocation schemes proposed in the international community. We consider a peri'ectly competitive trade market of carbon emission allowance and aim at minimizing abatement costs. The results show that with the constant improvement of global reduction targets, the price of emission allowance increases rapidly. However, no matter what allocation schemes or global reduction targets are, the ratio of' global total abatement costs to GDP will peak in 2040. Due to different reductinn ohligatious, MACs and GDP levels, the ratio of abatement costs to GDP varies enormously among regions. Above all, the allocation scheme is the most crucial to determine regional abatement costs and their distributions. Compared to abatement costs in developed countries, those in developing countries are influenced by the scheme more significantly. The selection of global emission pathway has no impact on the sequence of the abatement costs to GDP ratio in different regions under a given scheme, or on the sequence of abatement costs in a given region under various schemes. We further find that tile abatement costs to GDP ratio in China almost stabilizes at 0.5% during the years 2010-2050 under 10 of the 12 schemes.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期16-21,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"碳排放权分配方案的比较研究与博弈分析:公平与效率视角"(编号:71173131) 国家"十二五"科技支撑项目"碳排放交易支撑技术研究与示范"(编号:2012BAC20B12)
关键词 气候变化 排放权分配方案 边际减排成本曲线 碳交易 climate change emission rights allocation schemes marginal abatement cost curves carbon trading
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1UNFCCC. United Nations General Assembly, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [ R ]. New York: UNFCCC, 1992.
  • 2Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change [ J ]. American Economic Review : Paper & Proceedings, 2008, 98 ( 2 ) : 1 - 37.
  • 3何建坤,陈文颖,滕飞,刘滨.全球长期减排目标与碳排放权分配原则[J].气候变化研究进展,2009,5(6):362-368. 被引量:69
  • 4Global Commons Institute. GCI Briefing: Contraction-convergence [R/OL]. London: GCI, 2005 [2010 - 12 - 10]. http://www, gci. org. uk/briefings, html.
  • 5Lecocq F, Crassous R. International Climate Regime beyond 2012: Are Quota Allocation Rules Robust to Uncertainty [ R/OL ]. Washington DC: World Bank, 2003 [2011 - 04 - 05 ]. http:// ideas, repee, org/p/wbk/wbrwps/3000, html.
  • 6Experts from BASIC Countries. Equitable Access to Sustainable Development : Contribution to the Body of Scientific Knowledge [ R ]. Expert Forum: Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and New Delhi, 2011.
  • 7WinklerH, Spalding-Fecher R, Tyani L. Comparing Developing Countries under Potential Carbon Allocation Schemes [ J]. ClimatePolicy, 2002, ( 2 ) : 303 - 318.
  • 8Hoehen N, Elzen M D, Weiss M. Common but Differentiated Convergence (CDC) : A New Conceptual Approach to the Long-term Climate Policy [J]. Climate Policy, 2006, 6:181 - 199.
  • 9Gupta S. Bhmldari P M. An Effective Allocation Criterion for CO2 Emissions [J]. Energy Policy, 1999, 27:727-736.
  • 10王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO_2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1621-1624. 被引量:188

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2何建坤,刘滨,陈文颖.有关全球气候变化问题上的公平性分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(6):12-15. 被引量:46
  • 3陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 4Hamilton D L,Goldstein A G,Lee J,et al.MARKAL-MACRO:An Overview [R].Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) Report 483777,1992.
  • 5US Department of Energy.US MARKAL-MACRO Model Documentation [R].US Department of Energy Internal Report,1996.
  • 6WU Zongxin,Delaquil P,Larson E D,et al.Future Implications of China's Energy-Technology Choices [R].Prepared for Working Group on Energy Strategies and Technologies of the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development,2001.
  • 7Larson E D,WU Zongxin,Delaquil P,et al.Future implications of China's energy-technology choices [J].Energy Policy,2003,31:1189-1204.
  • 8Wendner R.A calibration procedure of dynamic CGE models for non-steady state situations using GEMPACK [J].Compu Econo,1999,13:265-287.
  • 9ZHANG Zhongxiang.The Economics of Energy Policy in China:Implications for Global Climate Change [M].Aldershot:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,1997.
  • 10WANG Can,CHEN Jining,ZOU Ji.Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China:1957-2000 [J].Energy,2005,31(1):73-83.

共引文献320

同被引文献192

引证文献12

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部