期刊文献+

组合式输尿管软镜和经皮肾镜治疗<2cm肾和输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 被引量:13

Modular flexible ureteroscopy versus PCNL for renal and upper ureter calculi less than 2 cm
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较组合式输尿管软镜(PolyScope)和经皮肾镜(PCNL)治疗<2cm肾和输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法:分别采用输尿管软镜和经皮肾镜取石术治疗<2cm的肾和输尿管上段结石患者26例和47例,统计比较两种方法的手术时间、术后住院时间、并发症、住院费用及一次碎石成功率。结果:输尿管软镜组和经皮肾镜组的手术时间分别为(70.2±14.7)min和(49.2±11.9)min,术后住院时间分别为(3.7±1.1)d和(6.5±2.1)d,住院费用分别为(21 318±1 171)元和(13 474±1 428)元,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。经皮肾镜组有7例出现感染、出血等不同程度并发症,输尿管软镜组无明显并发症,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。输尿管软镜组一次碎石成功率为80.8%,经皮肾镜组为95.7%,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但对于下盏结石,前者一次碎石成功率仅44.4%,后者达88.2%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:组合式输尿管软镜治疗<2cm肾和输尿管上段结石,在并发症、住院时间上依然具有优势,但在处理肾下盏结石时,一次碎石成功率不如经皮肾镜。建议在术前对病例进行选择,肾下盏漏斗肾盂角过小的下盏结石不宜选择输尿管软镜治疗。 Objective: To compare the clinical effects of modular flexible ureteroscopy(PolyScope) and percuta- neous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) for renal and upper ureter calculi less than 2 cm. Method: The records of 73 patients who underwent either PolyScope (n = 26) or PCNL (n= 47) by standard techniques for renal and upper ureter calculi less than 2 cm were reviewed retrospectively. Data including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, hospital fee and single-procedure success of stone-free rate were analyzed and compared in two groups. Result: The operative time of PolyScope group and PCNI, group were (70.2±14.7) min and (49.2±11.9) rain respectively. Postoperative hospital stay were (3.7±1.1) d and (6.5±2.1) d respectively. Hospital fee were (21 318±1 171) Yuan and (13 474±1 428) Yuan. The above data showed statistical differences (P〈0. 01). All complications were observed in group of PCNL including six cases with hemorrhage and one case with septic shock, which the complication rate was significantly higher than that of PolySeope group (P〈0.05). Single-procedure success of stone-free rate in PCNL group was 95.7%, which is better than another group (80.8%). The above data showed there was no statisiteal difference (P〉0.05). However, for lower calyx calculi, single- procedure success of stone-free rate in PolySeope group was only 44.4%, while PCNL group was 88.2%. There existed a statistical difference (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Modular flexible ureteroseopy is superior to PCNI. for less than 2 cm renal and upper ureter calculi in terms of the occurrence of complications and hospital stay. However, it does not have advantages in dealing with lower calyx calculi compared with PCNL. We suggest that operative indi- cation should be accurately identified.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第12期891-893,896,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 组合式输尿管软镜 经皮肾镜取石术 肾结石 输尿管上段结石 modular flexible ureteroscope percutaneous nephrolithotomy renal calculi upper ureter calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1E1-Nahas A R, Ibrahim H M, Youssef R F, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20mm[J]. BJUInt, 2012, 110(6): 898-902.
  • 2Koo V, Young M, Thompson T, et al. Cost-effective- ness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium- yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi [J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(11): 1913-1916.
  • 3Hussain M, Acher P, Penev B, et al. Redefining the limits of flexible ureterorenoseopy[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25(1): 45-49.
  • 4Bader M J, Gratzke C, Walther S, et al. The Poly Scope- a modular design, semidisposable flexible uret erorenoscope system[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24(7):1061-1066.
  • 5Weizer A Z, Auge B K, Silversein A D, et al. Rutine posterative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation[J]. J Urol, 2002, 168(1): 46- 50.
  • 6Chung B I, Aron M, Hegarty N J, et al. Ureteroscop- ie versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2- cm) renal calculi[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22(2): 343- 346.
  • 7Cannon G M, Smaldone M C, Wu H Y, et al. Uret eroscopic management of lower-pole stones in a pediat ric population[J]. J Endourol, 2007, 21(10): 1179- 1182.
  • 8Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes- a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial [J]. Urology, 2010, 75(3): 534-538.
  • 9程跃,严泽军,马建伟,袁鹤胜,谢国海,贾晓龙.组合式输尿管软镜联合钬激光治疗肾结石46例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2012,33(1):29-31. 被引量:93
  • 10黄云腾,顾思平,焦洋,齐隽.组合式输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床价值:附33例报告[J].第二军医大学学报,2011,32(10):1108-1112. 被引量:38

二级参考文献21

  • 1叶章群.尿石症诊断治疗指南.见:那彦群,主编.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南2009版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.166.
  • 2Bader M J, Gratzke C,Walther S, Schlenker B, Tilki D, Hocao- glu Y, et al. The PolyScope: a modular design, semidisposable flexible ureterorenoseope system[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24 : 1061-1066.
  • 3Moe O W. Kidney stones : pathophysiology and medical manage ment[J]. Lancet, 2006,367 : 333-344.
  • 4Dasgupta P,Cynk M S,Bultitude M F,Tiptaft R C,Glass J M. Flexible ureterorenoscopy: prospective analysis of the Guy's experience[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2004,86 367 -370.
  • 5Chung B I,Aron M, Hegarty N J, Desai M M. Ureteroscopie versus percutaneous treatment for medium size(1 2-cm) renal ealculi[J].J Endourol, 2008,22 : 343 346.
  • 6Weizer A Z,Springhart W P,Ekeruo W O,Matlaga B R,Tan Y H,Assimos D G, et al. Ureteroscopic management of renal cal- culi in anomalous kidneys[J].Urology,2005,65:265-269.
  • 7Breda A,Ogunyemi O,Leppert J T,Schulam P G. Flexible ure teroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones[J. Endo Uurol, 2009,55 1190-1196.
  • 8Cannon G M,Smaldone M C,Wu H Y,Bassett J C,Bellinger M F,Docimo S G, et al. Ureteroscopie management o{ lower-pole stones in a pediatric population[J]. J Endourol, 2007,21 1179- 1182.
  • 9Grasso M,Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi[J]. J Urol, 1998,160 346-351.
  • 10Mariani A J. Combined electrohydraulic and Holmium: YAG la ser ureteroscopic nephrolithptripsy of large(greater than 4 cm) renal calculi[J]. J Urol, 2007,177 : 168-173.

共引文献127

同被引文献138

引证文献13

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部