期刊文献+

经伤椎固定与经伤椎植骨在治疗胸腰段爆裂骨折的病例对照研究 被引量:3

Case control study on injured vertebra pedicle instrumentation and injured vertebra bone grafting for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较经伤椎固定与经伤椎植骨治疗胸腰段单节段爆裂骨折的临床疗效。方法:对2008年8月至2010年8月收治的48例胸腰段单节段爆裂骨折患者(均为A3型)进行回顾性分析,其中24例采用短节段固定联合伤椎椎弓根螺钉固定(A组),24例采用短节段固定联合伤椎椎体植骨(B组)。A组中男14例,女10例,平均年龄(44.0±7.4)岁(34~56岁);B组中男13例,女11例,平均年龄(42.5±7.1)岁(31~54岁)。比较两组术前和术后相关影像学参数及手术时间、出血量、并发症。结果:两组患者的性别、年龄、损伤部位、手术出血差异无统计学意义。手术时间A组少于B组。两组患者术后即刻椎体高度、后凸角均明显恢复;术后3个月与术后即刻比较,A组椎体高度、后凸角无明显丢失,但B组椎体高度、后凸角有明显丢失;术后1年与术后3个月比较,两组椎体高度、后凸角无进一步丢失。A组手术失败率小于B组。结论:对胸腰段单一爆裂骨折,经伤椎椎弓根固定手术时间少,比经伤椎植骨更有利于维持术后伤椎高度和矢状位排列,值得推广应用。 Objective :To compare the clinical effects of injured vertebra pedicle instrumentation and injured vertebra bone grafting in treating thoracolumbar fractures, nethods:A retrospective study was performed on 48 patients with single tboracolumbar fractures (type A3) from August 2008 to August 2010. Twenty-four patients were treated with injured vertebra pedicle instrumentation (group A) and 24 were treated with injured vertebra bone grafting (group B). There were 14 males and 10 females with an average age of (44.0±7.4) years old (34 to 56) in group A and there were 13 males and 11 females with an average age of (42.5±7.1) years (ranged, 31 to 54) in group B. Operation time, volume of blood loss, complications and the relative parameter of imageology were compared between two groups. Results:There was no significant difference in gender, age, position of injury,volume of blood loss between two groups. Operation time of group A was shorter than that of group B. Cobb angle and injured vertebral height obviously improved at the immediately postoperatively between two groups;there was no sig- nificant difference in group A between the immediately and three months postoperatively, but there was significant difference in group B ; there was no significant difference between three months and one year postoperatively in two groups. The failure rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A. Conclusion: Pedicle screw fixation in the injured vertebrae has advan- tage of short operation time, can obtain satisfactory effects and is better than injured vertebra bone grafting in maintaining the reduction in treating single thoracolumbar fractures.
机构地区 宁波市第六医院
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2013年第11期923-926,共4页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
关键词 脊柱骨折 骨折固定术 病例对照研究 Spinal fractures Fracture fixation,internal Case-control studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Butt MF,Farooq M,Mir B,et al. Management of unstable thora- columbar spinal injury by posterior short segment spinal fixation [J]. Int Orthop,2007,31 (2) :259-264.
  • 2张立海,杜海龙,梁永辉,陶笙,张群,郭义柱,梁向党,陈华,唐佩福,王岩.胸腰椎骨折经椎弓根内固定失败原因分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2010,26(5):403-406. 被引量:12
  • 3赵斌,罗华云,赵轶波,田江华,马迅.短节段椎弓根内固定并伤椎重建术治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(9):817-821. 被引量:27
  • 4潘勇,初同伟,郝勇,周跃,王卫东,王建,张正丰,张年春.经伤椎与不经伤椎椎弓根螺钉复位固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床对比研究[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(8):694-697. 被引量:42
  • 5Alvine GF, Swain JM, Asher MA, et al. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with variable screw placement or Isola instrumenta- tion and arthrodesis case series and literatrue review [J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004,17 (4) : 251-264.
  • 6An HS,Singh K,Vaccaro AR,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model:special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(3) :257-262.
  • 7Pickett GE, Campos -Benitez M, Keller JL, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006,31 (7) :799-805.
  • 8Orchowski J, Polly DW Jr, Klemme WR,et al. The effect of kyphosis on the mechanical strength of a long-segment posterior construct us- ing a synthetic model [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25 (13): 1644-1648.
  • 9Anekstein Y, Brosh T, Mirovsky Y. Intermediate screws in short seg- ment pedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures:a biome- chanical study [J].J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20 ( 1 ) : 72-77.
  • 10管功奎,崔永锋,朱宝华,包士忻,刘昌华.经伤椎与跨伤椎固定对椎体形态影响的临床观察[J].中国骨伤,2012,28(4):295-298. 被引量:10

二级参考文献38

共引文献85

同被引文献62

  • 1唐天驷.胸腰段脊柱脊髓损伤的外科治疗进展[J].中华创伤杂志,1995,11(6):327-329. 被引量:34
  • 2杜心如,赵玲秀,石继川,孔祥玉.经伤椎椎弓根螺钉复位治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的临床解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2007,25(3):239-242. 被引量:90
  • 3周武庆,李义梅.P物质与炎症研究进展[J].国外医学(免疫学分册),1997,20(2):95-98. 被引量:26
  • 4Vaccaro AR,Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ,et al.A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2005; 30(20):2325-2333.
  • 5Vaccaro AR,Zeiller SC,Hulbert RJ,et al.The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech.2005;18(3):209-215.
  • 6Roy-Camille R,SaUlant G, Mazel C.Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with Pedicle screw plates Orthop Clin North Am. 1986;17:147-159.
  • 7Flamme CH,Hurschler C,Heymann C,et al.Comparative biomechanical testing Of anterior and posterior stabilization procedures.Spine.2005;30(13):352-362.
  • 8Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA.Does 'canal clearance' affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(5):629-635.
  • 9Reinhold M,Knop C,Lange U,et al.Non-operative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fraetures.Long-term clinical results over-16years.Unfallehirurg.2003; 106(7):566-557.
  • 10Fredrickson BE, Mann KA, Yuan HA, et al. Reduction of the intracanal fragment in experimental burst fractures. Spine.1988;13: 267-271.

引证文献3

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部