期刊文献+

飞秒激光辅助LASIK术后早期角膜生物力学各指标的变化 被引量:3

Short- term changes of corneal biomechanical properties after FS- LASIK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)使用Femto LDV飞秒激光制瓣近视患者的角膜生物力学各指标的变化。方法:选取93例186眼近视患者均行飞秒激光辅助LASIK术。分别于术前;术后3,6mo应用眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)检测角膜补偿眼压(corneal compensated intraocular pressure,Iopcc)、模拟Goldmann眼压(Goldmann correlated IOP value,Iopg)、角膜阻力因子(corneal resistance factor,CRF)、角膜滞后量(corneal hysteresis,CH)。超声角膜厚度测量。比较术后3mo与术前,术后6mo与术后3mo测量值的差异。结果:术后3mo中央角膜平均厚度为447.61±39.57μm与术前539.88±29.72μm比较,差异有显著统计学意义(t=-47.223,P=0.000);术后6mo 448.78±39.19μm较术后3mo厚度差异有统计学意义(t=2.15,P=0.033)。术后3mo Iopcc,Iopg分别为13.75±2.13,9.54±2.35mmHg较术前16.29±2.88,15.09±3.29mmHg显著降低(t=-13.604,-23.594;P=0.000,0.000)。Iopcc,Iopg分别较术前降低2.55±2.25,5.55±3.21mmHg。术后6mo 13.61±1.96,9.32±2.07mmHg与术后3mo比较差异无统计学意义(t=-0.977,1.447,P=0.33,0.15)。CRF,CH术后3mo测量值6.36±1.45,7.71±1.30mmHg较术前9.84±1.99,9.77±1.56mmHg显著降低(t=-24.116,-19.171;P=0.000,0.000)。CRF,CH分别较术前降低3.49±1.97,2.06±1.47mmHg。术后6mo 6.24±1.38,7.67±1.25mmHg与术后3mo比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.456,0.636,P=0.147,0.525)。结论:飞秒激光辅助LASIK术对角膜生物力学有显著影响,术后角膜生物力学各指标较术前显著降低。术后3mo内生物力学各指标基本稳定。 AIM: To investigate the changes of corneal biomechanics after Femto LDV laser flapping in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Preoperatively, 3 months, 6 months after LASIK, 93 myopia patients ( 186 eyes ) in flapping procedure by Femto LDV laser were examined by Ocular response analyzer (ORA).The central corneal thickness ( CCT ) was also measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. Parameters were compared between postoperative ( 3 months) and preoperative, postoperative (6 months). Comparisons included the corneal thickness and corneal compensated intraocular pressure ( Iopcc ) , Goldmann correlated IOP value ( Iopg ) , corneal resistance factor ( CRF) , corneal hysteresis ( CH) . RESULTS: The CCT ( 447.61 ±39.57μm ) were significantly changed comparing with preoperative (539.88±29.72μm) (t=-47.223;P=0.000).The CCT of 6 months postoperative ( 448.78 ±39.19μm ) was slightly thicker than that of 3 months'(t=2.15,P=0.033).Iopcc, Iopg of 3 months after LASIK (13.75±2.13, 9.54±2.35) mmHg were significantly changed comparing with preoperative (16.29±2.88, 15.09±3.29 )mmHg (t=-13.604,-23.594;P=0.000, 0.000).The difference was (2.55 ±2.25, 5.55 ± 3.21) mmHg.There were no significant changes between Iopcc, Iopg of 6 months (13.61±1.96,9.32±2.07)mmHg and that of 3 months after LASIK. CRF and CH of 3 months after LASIK (6.36±1.45,7.71±1.30)mmHg were significantly changed comparing with preoperative's (9.84±1.99,9.77±1.56)mmHg (t=-24.116, -19.171; P=0.000, 0.000).The difference was (3.49 ±1.97, 2.06 ± 1.47 ) mmHg. There were no statistical differences between 6 months (6.24 ±1.38, 7.67 ±1.25) mmHg and 3 months(t=1.456, 0.636;P=0.147, 0.525). CONCLUSION: The corneal biomechanical properties after FS-LASIK are lower than that of preoperative. Corneal biomechanics sustains steadily about 3 months after LASIK.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2013年第12期2554-2556,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 飞秒激光 角膜厚度 角膜生物力学 femtosecond laser corneal thickness corneal biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Li H, Sun T, Wang M,et al. Safety and effectiveness of thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser and microkeratome in the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients. J Refract Surg 2010 ,26 ( 2 ) :99-106.
  • 2张玙,杜之渝.角膜屈光术后欠矫和回退的原因及治疗方法[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(3):296-300. 被引量:7
  • 3Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005 ,31 (1) : 156-162.
  • 4Ambrosio R Jr, Dawson DG, Salomao M,et al. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye. J Refract Surg 2010,26 (11) :906-911.
  • 5Shin J, Kim TW, Park SJ,et al. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and goldmann applanation tonometx'y. J Glaucoma 2013. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
  • 6Troost R,Vogel A, Beck S,et al. Clinical comparison of two intraocular pressure measurement methods: SmartLens dynamic observing tonography versus Goldmann. C, raefe,s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001 ,239(12) :889-892.
  • 7Chen S, Chen D, Wang J,et al. Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2010 , 26 ( 4 ) : 279- 288.
  • 8Medeiros FW, Sinha-Roy A, Alves MR,et al. Biomechanical corneal changes induced by different flap thickness created by femtosecond laser. Clinics ( Sao Paulo ) 2011 ,66(6) :1067-1071.
  • 9李福生,张晶,尹鸿芝,周跃华.两种不同制瓣方式对LASIK术角膜瓣厚度的影响[J].国际眼科杂志,2012,12(6):1056-1058. 被引量:5
  • 10Ou RJ, Shaw EL, Glasgow BJ. Keratoectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) :evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thiekness. Am J Ophthalmol 2002 , 134 ( 5 ) :771-773.

二级参考文献105

  • 1潘青,顾扬顺.近视LASIK术后屈光回退眼和非回退眼角膜形态改变的差异[J].眼科研究,2005,23(1):86-88. 被引量:13
  • 2李莹,金玉梅,王忠海,孙玉敏,李海燕.屈光性角膜手术26743例回顾[J].国际眼科杂志,2004,4(6):1031-1035. 被引量:19
  • 3李新宇,刘磊,包百鸣.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗原位角膜磨镶术后屈光欠矫的临床观察[J].医学临床研究,2006,23(8):1191-1192. 被引量:3
  • 4Fontes BM,Ambrosio R Jr,Velarde GC,et al.Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconas with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.J Refract Surg 2010:19:1-7.
  • 5Liu J,Roberts CJ.Influence of corneal biomechanieal properties on intraocular pressure measurement:quantitative analysis.J Cataract Refract Surg 2005:31(1):146-155.
  • 6Shah S,Laiquzzaman M,Cunliffe I,et al.The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis,corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes.Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006:29(5):257-262.
  • 7Guirao A.Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery:risk factors for keratectasia.J Refract Surg 2005:21(2):176-185.
  • 8Kida T,Liu JH,Weinreb RN.Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006:47(10):4422-4426.
  • 9Kynigopoulos M,Schlote T,Kotecha A,et al.Repeatability of intraocular pressure and comeal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2008:225(5):357-360.
  • 10Cohen EJ,Myers JS.Keratoconus and normal-tension glaucoma:a study of the possible association with abnormal biomechanical properties as measured by corneal hysteresis.Cornea 2010:29(9):955-970.

共引文献50

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部