期刊文献+

造影导管在左心室电极植入中应用价值 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨造影导管在心脏再同步化治疗左心室电极植入中应用的可行性。方法慢性心力衰竭患者28例随机分为造影导管组和常规方法组各14例,常规方法组通过骨性标记经长鞘操控导丝并植入三腔起搏器左心室电极,造影导管组在导管造影指导下寻找冠状窦,操控导丝至目标血管后植入三腔起搏器左心室电极。观察2组左心室电极植入时间、X线曝光时间、造影剂用量以及左心室电极植入侧静脉/侧后静脉成功率。结果 2组术中均未出现并发症;造影导管组手术时间为(21.3±5.6)min,造影剂用量为(37±12)mL,X线曝光时间为(10.5±4.6)min,电极植入侧静脉/侧后静脉成功率为100.0%;常规治疗组手术时间为(32.1±11.3)min,造影剂用量为(21±5)mL,X线曝光时间为(16.9±7.7)min,电极植入侧静脉/侧后静脉成功率为64.3%,2组以上指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论心脏再同步化治疗中应用造影导管指导左心室电极植入有效、可行。
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2013年第12期1207-1208,共2页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Moss A J, Hall W J, Cannom D S, et al. Cardiac- resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events[J]. NEngJ Med,2009,361(14):1329-2338.
  • 2高文霞,纳丽莎,叶晶晶,刘丽文,拓胜军,左蕾,张军,朱文倩.慢性心力衰竭患者心脏再同步化治疗无应答危险因素分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2013,27(2):115-117. 被引量:17
  • 3无.慢性心力衰竭诊断治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(12):1076-1095. 被引量:3684
  • 4Cleland J, Daubert J G, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in hearl failure[J]. N Eng J Med,2005,352(15) :1539-1549.
  • 5Ypenburg C, van Bommel R J, Delgado V, et al. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynehronization therapy[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008,52(17) : 1402-1409.
  • 6Wilton S B, Shibata M A, Sondergaard R, et al. Relationship between left ventricular Lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long term outcome with resynchronization therapy [J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2008,23(3) :219-227.
  • 7金炜,孟卫栋,汪芳,张建军,孙宝贵,刘少稳.左室电极起搏位置与心脏再同步化治疗的疗效[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2011,25(4):306-309. 被引量:8

二级参考文献69

  • 1王方正,张澍,黄德嘉,华伟,孙宝贵,沈法荣,吴书林,王建安,方全,吴立群,王景峰,王冬梅,郭涛,陈新,中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会心脏再同步治疗专家工作组.心脏再同步治疗慢性心力衰竭的建议[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2006,10(2):90-102. 被引量:90
  • 2John Suiton MG, Plappert T, Abrahan WT, et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular size and function in chronic heart failure [J]. Circulation, 2003,107 ( 15 ) : 1 985.
  • 3Yu CM, Wing-Hong FI, Zhang Q, et al. Understanding nonrespon- ders of cardiac resynchronization therapy current and future per- spectives [ J ]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2005, 16 (t0) :1 117.
  • 4Nicolas D, Paul S, Lome J, et al. Optimizing hemodynamics in heart patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites [J]. JACC, 2010, 55(6) :566.
  • 5Cle|and JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al, The effect of cardiacre- synchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2005,352 :l 539.
  • 6Claudia Y, Rutger J, Victororia D, et al. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resnchronization therapy [ J]. JACC,2008,52 (17) : 1 402.
  • 7Carel C, Dick H, Emile J, et al. Effects of stimulation site on dias- tolic function in cardiac resynchronization therapy [ J ]. PACE, 2007,30 : s40.
  • 8Mads B, Andi E, Jens C, et al. Long-term clinical outcome and left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy [ J ]. Europace, 2009, 11:1 177.
  • 9Faisal M, Kevin E, Veena K, et al. Interlead distance and left ven- tricular lead electrical delay predict reverse remodeling during cardi- ac resynchronization therapy[ J]. PACE, 2010,33:575.
  • 10Kleemann T, Schneider S, Cornelius BG. Impact of ventricular lead position on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and clinical out- come in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy [ J]. J Interv Card Eleetrophysio1,2010,3:3.

共引文献3706

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部