非数额型盗窃罪法律适用问题研究——兼评《刑法修正案(八)》第39条对司法实践的影响

Research on Judicial Application of Non-amount Larceny——Comment on the Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ Article 39's Impacts on Judicial Practice

《刑法修正案(八)》修改了盗窃罪的构成要件,增加了"入户盗窃"、"携带凶器盗窃"和"扒窃"三种非数额型盗窃。此次修改对盗窃罪传统的定罪标准造成了冲击,同时也产生了过度犯罪化、浪费司法资源、自由裁量权过大、定罪量刑尺度不一致等一系列问题。对于非数额型盗窃罪,司法机关应当在明确其构成要件的基础上,合理地限制入罪条件,并做到量刑规范化,确保同案同判、罪刑均衡。

The Criminal Law Amendment Ⅷ has modified the constitutive elements of Larceny. Three kinds of non-amount theft, including burglary, theft with weapon and pick-pocketing, are defined as Larceny. The modifidication of Criminal Law has an impact on the traditional convictive standard of Larceny, meanwhile it has caused several problems such as excessive criminalization, the waste of juridical resources, exceeded power of judgment and measure, divergence between conviction and sentencing etc. On the basis of defining the constitutive elements of new type on Larceny ,Judicial organs should restrict constituting condition rea sonably and devote to standardized sentencing to ensure the same verdict in the same kind of cases and the balance between crime and punishment.