互联网产业驱动下的著作权规则变革被引量：77

The Revolution of Copyright Rules under the Internet Industry

导出

摘要互联网产业与版权产业的分离,使两者在传播效率与许可效率的需求上出现差异。著作权法作为以保护版权产业为初衷的制度工具,在维护许可效率时忽略了对传播效率的合理考量,使其既无法满足互联网产业的需要,也难以解决版权产业的新问题,导致各方通过私人创制的著作权规则来维护各自的产业利益。私立著作权规则以许可合同调整法定权利配置,使产业主体得以根据自身需要对传播效率与许可效率加以取舍。为适应互联网产业模式的兴起,一方面应发掘私立著作权规则的制度优势,并承认其合法性;另一方面在保留既有法定权利体系的前提下调整权利类型及其限制方式,以配合私立著作权规则的运作。 As the internet industry has been separated from traditional copyright industry, they appear to have different measures on dissemination efficiency and licensing efficiency. As an institutional tool to protecting copyright industries, copyright law ignores the importance of dissemination efficiency at the time of maintaining permission efficiency, which makes the copyright law is able neither to satisfy the requirements of the internet industry nor solve the new issues in copyright industry. Therefore, both internet industry and copyright industry turn to adopt private copyright rules to support their own interests. Private copyright rules, which composed by several kinds of copyright licenses, can adjust copyright entitlement to have a tradeoff between dissemination efficiency and licensing efficiency based on different industry mode. In order to adapt the rise of internet industry, it is necessary to explore the institutional advantages and clarify its legality on the one hand, but on the other hand to adjust the types of right and restriction models in order to coordinate the operation of copyright law.

作者熊琦

机构地区中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

出处《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期79-90,共12页 China Legal Science

基金国家社科基金项目"产业利益博弈与著作权集体管理制度变革研究"(项目编号:13CFX091)的阶段性成果

关键词私立著作权规则法定著作权规则著作权许可版权产业互联网产业

分类号 D923.41 [政治法律—民商法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献54

1Yochai Benkler, From Consumers to Users. Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Towards Sustainable Commons and User Access, 52 Fed. Comm. I~ J. 561,562(2000).
2Robert P. Merges, The Concept of Property in the Digital Age, 45 Hous. L. Rev. 1239,1274 -1275(2008).
3Severine Dusollier, Sharing Access to Intellectual Property through Private Ordering, 82 Chi -Kent L. Rev. 1391,1392 -1393 (2007).
4Lydia Pallas Loren, Slaying the Leather - Winged Demons in the Night . Reforming Copyright Owner Contracting with Clickwrap Misuse, 30 Ohio N. U. L. Rev. 495,496-499(2004).
5Edward Lee, Warming Up to User-Generated Content, 2008 Ⅲ. Ill. L. Rev. 1459,1460(2008).
6ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F. 3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996) ; MDY Indus v. Blizzard Entm' t, 629 F. 3d 928 (9th Cir. 2010).
7“北京-中院民事判决书(2006)-中民初字第14468号”.
8"北京-中院民事判决书(2011)-中民终字第5969号".
9熊琦.著作权法中投资者视为作者的制度安排[J].法学,2010(9):79-89. 被引量：93
10Stephen E. Siwek, Copyright Industries in the U. S. Economy (2011), International Intellectual Property Alliance, p. 8.

二级参考文献68

1郑成思.侵害知识产权的无过错责任[J].中国法学,1998(1):81-90. 被引量：101
2Robert P. Mergset al., lnteUectual Property in the New Technological Age (4th edition), Aspen Publishers, 2006, p. 13, p. 430.
3Paul Goldstein, Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines (5th edition), Foundation Press, 2002, p.6.
4U. S. Const. art. Ⅰ, §8, cl. 8.
5L. RayPatterson,Copyright and "The Exclusive Right" of Authors, 1 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1, 1993, p. 24.
6William M.Landers and Richard A. Posner, An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. Legal Stud. 325, 1989, p. 327.
7刘德宽.《民法总则》(增订四版),中国政法大学出版社2006年版,第50页.
8马傻驹、余延满.《民法原论》第3版,法律出版社2007年版,第55-56页.
9Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity, Penguin Press, 2004, p.173.
10Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox (revised edition), Stanford University Press, 2003, pp. 31 -37.