期刊文献+

正确认识和提高Meta分析的质量 被引量:5

Correct Recognition and Quality Improvement of Meta Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 正确认识和提高Meta分析的质量至关重要。高质量的Meta分析属于最高的循证医学证据级别,但是由于其本身属于回顾性研究,无法消除合并研究的异质性,发表偏移也不可避免,Meta分析仍存在一定的局限性。为了提高Meta分析的质量除了正确选题外,还必须注意下列事项:收集数据要注意文献的全面性、研究质量、正确的统计方法和写作质量。 Its important to correctly recognizing and improving the quality of Meta analysis. High qualified Meta a- nalysis belongs to the highest level of evidence-based medicine. However because it belongs to the retrospective research, the heterogeneity of the merged researches couldn't be eliminated, the publish bias is also inevitable, and there exists some limits of Meta analysis. To improve the quality of Meta analysis, besides correct selection of the subjects, the following i- tems should be noticed, i. e. , paying attention to the generality, research quality, correctness of the statistical methods and writing qulaity of the literatures when collecting data.
作者 王军 王小钦
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第11期824-825,共2页 Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词 META分析 质量 统计方法 Meta analysis Quality Statistical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Sacks HS,Berrier J,Reitman D,et al.Meta-analyses of random-ized controlled trials[J].N Engl J Med,1987,316(8):450-455.
  • 2Turner EH,Matthews AM,Linardatos al.Selective publica-tion of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy[J].N Engl J Med,2008,358(2):252-260.
  • 3Delaney A,Bagshaw SM,Ferland A,et al.The quality of reportsof critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of System-atic Reviews: an independent appraisal[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(2):589-594.
  • 4Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of re-ports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J].Con-trol Clin Trials,1996,17(1): 1-12.
  • 5GA Wells,B Shea,D OConnelhe,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS)for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in me-ta-analyses[EB/OL].[2013-11-12].http://www.ohri.ca/pro-grams/clinical_epidemiology/oxford,asp.
  • 6Higgins JP,Thompson SG,Deeks JJ,etal.Measuring inconsisten-cy in meta_analyses[J].BMJ,2003,327(7414): 557-560.
  • 7Moher D,Liberati At Tetzlaff J,et al.Preferred Reporting Itemsfor Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA State-ment[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2009,62(10): 1006-1012.

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部