期刊文献+

pH监测阴性非糜烂性反流病患者食管体部蠕动中断长度与症状严重程度的关系 被引量:3

Association between the length of peristaltic break of esophageal body and the severity of the symptoms in patients with non-erosive reflux disease and negative pH monitoring
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨pH监测阴性非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者食管体部蠕动中断长度(LPB)与症状严重程度的相关性。方法纳入35例pH监测阴性NERD患者,同时选取10名健康对照者。采用食管高分辨率测压(HRM)检测两组的食管体部LPB,pH监测阴性NERD患者同时进行症状评分。两组间食管体部LPB比较采用t检验;Pearson相关分析研究pH监测阴性NERD患者食管体部LPB与症状严重程度的关系。结果pH监测阴性NERD患者食管体部平均LPB为(3.3±0.9)cm,长于健康对照者的(1.2±0.4)cm,差异有统计学意义(t=9.17,P〈0.01)。pH监测阴性NERD患者症状评分为21.6±7.8。pH监测阴性NERD患者食管体部LPB与症状评分呈正相关(r=0.894,P〈0.01)。结论食管体部蠕动中断是食管蠕动功能障碍的一种食管动力学表现,与NERD症状的发生相关。 Objective To explore the correlation between the length of peristaltic break (LPB) and the severity of the symptoms in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and negative pH monitoring. Methods A total of 35 patients with NERD and negative pH monitoring were enrolled, and at same time 10 healthy individuals were selected as controls. The LPB of esophageal body of both groups was measured by high resolution manometry (HRM). Meanwhile, the symptom of NERD patients with negative pH monitoring was scored. The LPB of esophageal body between the two groups was compared by t test. The correlation between the LPB and the severity of the symptoms in NERD patients with negative pH monitoring was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Results The average LPB of esophageal body of NERD patients with negative pH monitoring was (3.3±0.9) cm, which was longer than that of healthy controls ((1. 2 ±0. 4) cm), and the difference was statistically significant (t= 9.17,P〈0.01). The symptom score of NERD patients with negative pH monitoring was 21.6 ± 7. 8. There was a positive correlation between the LPB and NERD symptom score (r= 0. 894, P〈0. 01). Conclusion The LPB of esophageal body is a kind of expression of esophageal motility dysfunction, which is correlated with the symptom of NERD.
出处 《中华消化杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期822-825,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestion
关键词 氢离子浓度 胃食管反流 测压法 蠕动 Hydrogen-ion concentration Gastroesophageal reflux Manometry Peristalsis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献50

  • 1薛艳,周丽雅,林三仁.奥美拉唑治疗前后糜烂性食管炎患者食管鳞状上皮细胞间隙的变化[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(2):93-95. 被引量:3
  • 2陶金,肖英莲,陈旻湖,彭穗,林金坤,熊理守,胡品津.埃索美拉唑治疗前后胃食管反流病食管黏膜上皮细胞间隙的变化[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(6):392-395. 被引量:6
  • 3徐勇勇 宇传华 陈平雁等.诊断和筛查试验的研究设计与分析[A].方积乾 主编.医学统计学与电脑实验:第2版[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001.327-344.
  • 4[1]Kennedy T,Jones R.The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a UK population and the consultation behaviour of patients with these symptoms.Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14:1589-1594
  • 5[2]Locke GR 3rd,Talley NJ,Fett SL,Zinsmeister AR,Melton LJ 3rd.Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux:a population-based study in Olmsted County,Minnesota.Gastroenterology 1997; 112:1448-1456
  • 6[3]Shaw MJ,Talley NJ,Beebe TJ,Rockwood T,Carlsson R,Adlis S,Fendrick AM,Jones R,Dent J,Bytzer P.Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:52-57
  • 7[4]Chen M,Xiong L,Chen H,Xu A,He L,Hu P.Prevalence,risk factors and impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms:a population-based study in South China.Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40:759-767
  • 8[5]Wahlqvist P.Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease,perceived productivity,and health-related quality of life.Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:S57-S61
  • 9[6]Sandler RS,Everhart JE,Donowitz M,Adams E,Cronin K,Goodman C,Gemmen E,Shah S,Avdic A,Rubin R.The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States.Gastroenterology 2002; 122:1500-1511
  • 10[7]Moss SF,Armstrong D,Arnold R,Ferenci P,Fock KM,Holtmann G,McCarthy DM,Moraes-Filho JP,Mutschler E,Playford R,Spechler SJ,Stanghellini V,Modlin IM.GERD 2003-a consensus on the way ahead.Digestion 2003; 67:111-117

共引文献486

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部