期刊文献+

英夫利西治疗62例克罗恩病疗效观察 被引量:8

Clinical efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of 62 cases with Crohn's disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价英夫利西治疗CD患者的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2009年2月至2013年3月使用英夫利西治疗的62例CD患者的临床资料,选取英夫利西治疗后第14周(英夫利西注射3次后)和本研究随访终点(2013年3月)2个观察点。观察英夫利西治疗后第14周的CRP水平、克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)评分情况及临床缓解情况。在随访终点,观察英夫利西治疗后的临床缓解情况、肛瘘闭合情况、结肠黏膜愈合情况及不良反应。正态分布数据用j±S表示,t检验比较治疗前后差异。非正态分布数据用中位数(下四分位数,上四分位数)表示,Wilcoxon非参数检验比较治疗前后差异。结果剔除4例注射未满3次的患者、1例失访的患者、9例术后预防复发的患者,共有48例处于活动期的CD患者纳入疗效研究。第14周时,48例患者的CRP为1.9(0.5,5.4)mg/L,与治疗前的28.9(6.4,51.1)mg/I。相比下降(Z=-5.468,P〈0.01);CDAI评分为87.0±35.8,与治疗前(245.1±59.1)相比显著下降(t=18.579,P〈0.01)。第14周时,46例CD活动患者达到临床缓解,缓解率为95.8%。随访终点时,仍有38例患者维持临床缓解,缓解率为79.2%。有26例患者在英夫利西治疗前有活动性肛瘘,7例(26.9%)肛瘘完全闭合,17例(65.4%)部分闭合,2例(7.7%)无反应。15例患者在英夫利西治疗≥6次后肠镜复查,治疗后简化CD内镜评分(SES—CD)为3(O,5),较治疗前[8(7,9)]下降(z=-3.306,P=0.001)。48例CD活动患者中22例采用上阶梯治疗,26例采用下阶梯治疗。第14周时,上阶梯治疗组有20例(90.9%)、下阶梯治疗组有26例(100.0%)进入临床缓解;随访终点时,上阶梯治疗组有14例(63.6%)、下阶梯治疗组有24例(92.3%)维持临床缓解。26例肛瘘患者中2例无反应者均为上阶梯治疗组,完全闭合者7例均为下阶梯治疗组。62例患者中有5例发生不良反应,其中3例为急性输液反应,1例为迟发性输液反应,1例发生贫血。结论英夫利西在控制CD患者炎性反应活动、诱导临床缓解、促进肛瘘闭合及黏膜愈合方面体现出较好的疗效。对部分高危CD患者使用下阶梯治疗也显现了较好的疗效。 Objective To evaluate the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Methods clinical efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) in the From February 2009 to March 2013, the clinical data of 62 CD patients with IFX treatment were retrospectively analyzed. At week 14th after IFX injection and the end of follow-up of this study (March 2013) were two observation points. At week 14th after IFX injection (three times of IFX injection), C reactive protein (CRP) level, Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score and clinical remission were investigated. At the end of follow-up, clinical remission, fistula closure, mucosal healing and side effects were inspected. Normal distribution data were expressed as x± s, which were compared with t test. Non normal distribution data were expressed as M (QL-Qu) and compared with Wilcoxon test. Results Four cases without complete three times of IFX injection and one case lost to follow-up were eliminated. And nine postoperation cases with IFX treatment to prevent recurrence after surgery were excluded. A total of 48 cases of CD in active period were enrolled in this study on efficacy. At week 14th , CRP level of 48 patients [1.9(0.5,5.4) mg/L] decreased compared with that before treatment [28. 9(6. 4,51.1) mg/L] (Z=-5.468, P〈0.01); CDAI score (87.0±35.8) also decreased compared with that before treatment (245.1±59.1) (t= 18. 579, P〈0. 01). At week 14th, 46 patients in active period achieved clinical remission and the remission rate was 95.8%. By the end of follow-up, 38 patients were still in remission period and the remission rate was 79. 2%. Among 26 patients with anal fistula before IFX treatment, seven cases (26. 9%) were completely closed, 17 cases (65.4%) was partially closed and two cases was responseless. Fifteen patients were reviewed by colonoscopic examination after more than six times of IFX treatment. The median of simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) was 3 (0, 5) after treatment, which decreased compared with that before treatment (8 (7,9), Z=- 3. 306, P = 0. 001). Twenty-two of 48 cases in active period received, step-up strategy and 26 cases received with top down strategy. At week 14th, 20 cases (90. 9%) of group with step-up strategy and 26 cases (100.0%) of group with top down strategy were in remission period. By the end of follow-up, 14 cases (63.6%) of group with step up strategy and 24 cases (92.3%) of group with top-down strategy maintained remission. Among 26 cases with anal fistula, two cases without response were treated with step-up strategy and seven cases with complete closure were all with top-down strategy. Among 62 patients, five had side effects, three of whom had acute infusion reaction, one had delayed infusion reaction and the other had anemia. Conclusions IFX had good clinical efficacy in controlling inflammation, inducing clinical remission, promoting fistula closure and mucosal healing in CD patients. For some CD patients with high risk, the initial top-down strategy showed good clinical efficacy.
出处 《中华消化杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期835-839,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestion
关键词 CROHN病 抗体 单克隆 直肠瘘 肠黏膜 Crohn disease Antibodies, monoclonal Rectal fistula Intestinal mucosa
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1高翔,胡品津,何瑶,廖山婴,彭穗,陈旻湖.炎症性肠病患者血清中自身抗体检测的临床意义[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(6):428-430. 被引量:39
  • 2刘思德,姜泊,周殿元.放大内镜结合黏膜染色技术诊断溃疡性结肠炎——附116例放大内镜形态分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2005,10(2):116-118. 被引量:8
  • 3李亚红,韩英,吴开春.炎症性肠病危险因素的流行病学调查研究[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2006,15(2):161-162. 被引量:19
  • 4Targan SR, Hanauer SB, van Deventer SJ,et al. A shortterm study of chimeric monoelonal antibody cA2 to tumor necrosis factor alpha for Crohn's disease. Crohn's Disease cA2 Study Group. N EnglJ Med, 1997,337:1029-1035.
  • 5Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT Ⅰ randomised trial. Lancet, 2002,359: 1541-1549.
  • 6Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S,et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med, 1999,340:1398-1405.
  • 7Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med, 2004,350:876-885.
  • 8Rutgeerts P, Van Assehe G, Vermeire S. Review article: Infliximab therapy for inflammatory bowel disease-seven years on. Aliment Pharmaeol Ther, 2006,23: 451-463.
  • 9Lichtenstein GR, Abreu MT, Cohen R, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology, 2006, 130:940-987.
  • 10Clark M, Colombel JF, Feagan BC,et al. American gastro enterological association consensus development conference on the use of biologics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, June 21-23, 2006. Gastroenterology, 2007, 133: 312-339.

共引文献1532

同被引文献45

  • 1Jong Seung Lee,Jee Hyun Lee,Ji Hyuk Lee,Hye Jin Lee,Mi Jin Kim,Hae Jeong Lee,Yon Ho Choe.Efficacy of early treatment with infliximab in pediatric Crohn’s disease[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(14):1776-1781. 被引量:10
  • 2Gerhard Rogler,Stephan Vavricka,Alain Schoepfer,Peter L Lakatos.Mucosal healing and deep remission: What does it mean?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(43):7552-7560. 被引量:4
  • 3邹宁,刘晓红,周旭东.克罗恩病与肠结核的临床分析与比较[J].临床内科杂志,2005,22(12):827-830. 被引量:26
  • 4中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病协作组,欧阳钦,胡品津,钱家鸣,郑家驹,胡仁伟.对我国炎症性肠病诊断治疗规范的共识意见(2007年,济南)[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(8):545-550. 被引量:1022
  • 5胡品津.生物制剂在克罗恩病治疗中的应用—现状和前景[J].胃肠病学,2007,12(11):646-649. 被引量:5
  • 6Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn's disease[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004,126 (2) : 402-413. DOI:10. 1053/j. gastro. 2003.11. 014.
  • 7Colombel JF, Louis E, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Deep remission., a new concept? [J]. Dig Dis, 2012,30 Suppl 3= $107-111. DOI: 10. 1159/000342732.
  • 8Molander P, Sipponen T, Kernppainen H, et al. Achievement of deep remission during scheduled maintenance therapy with TNFa-blocking agents in IBD[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2013, 7(9):730-735. DOI: 10. 1016/j. crohns. 2012.10. 018.
  • 9Zallot C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Deep remission in inflammatory bowel disease: looking beyond symptoms [ J/OL ]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2013,15 (3): 31512013-01-27]. http:// link. springer, corn/article/10. 1007/sl1894-013-0315-7/fulltext. html. DOh 10. 1007/s11894-013-0315-7.
  • 10Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Mantzaris GJ, et al. Randomised clinical trial: deep remission in biologic and immunomodulator naive patients with Crohnr s disease--a SONIC post hoe analysis[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2015,41 (8) : 734-746. DOI: 10.1111/apt. 13139.

引证文献8

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部