期刊文献+

UGT1A1基因多态性在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗转移性结直肠癌中的临床意义 被引量:7

Clinical significance of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms on FOLFIRI regimen as second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶(UGT) 1A1基因多态性在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中的安全性和作为疗效预测指标的价值.方法 在FOLFIRI方案化疗前分离mCRC患者外周血中单核细胞,采用荧光定量PCR-HRM法测定UGT1A1基因型.根据NCI CTC 3.0和RECIST 1.0标准分别评价化疗的不良反应和疗效,并分析UGT1 A1基因多态性与不良反应和近期有效率(RR)的关系.用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,Log-rank检验分析UGT1A1基因型对无进展生存期(PFS)的影响.结果 38例患者中,UGT1A1* 28位点的野生型(TA6/6)有31例(81.6%),杂合突变型(TA6/7)2例(5.3%),纯合突变型(TA7/7)5例(13.2%);UGT1A1*6位点的野生型(G/G)有28例(73.7%),杂合突变型(G/A)8例(21.1%),纯合突变型(A/A)2例(5.3%).在3~4级延迟性腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的发生率方面,UGT1A1*28的野生型(TA6/6)显著低于TA6/7和TA7/7基因型(P<0.05),UGT1A1*6的野生型(G/G)也显著低于G/A和A/A基因型(P<0.05).RR和PFS在UGT1A1各种基因型之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在FOLFIRI方案二线治疗mCRC中,UGT1A1* 28位点和UGT1A1 *6位点突变可以作为严重的延迟性腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的预测指标,但UGT1A1基因多态性与疗效无关. Objective To investigate uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase(UGT) 1A1 gene polymorphism as the predictor of safety and efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen as second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells form the mCRC patients were separated before FOLFIRI chemotherapy and the UGT1 A1 genotypes were determined by the fluorescence quantitative PCR-HRM method.The side effects and tumor response were evaluated using NCICTC 3.0 and RECIST 1.0 criterion,respectively.The correlation between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms and side effects or objective response rate(ORR) was subsequently analyzed.Progression free survival(PFS) was recorded and survival analysis was carried out by Kaplan-Meier method for the impact of genotypes on PFS.Results The UGT1A1 genotypes in 38 consecutive patients were as follows:UGT1 A1 * 28 homozygous wild-type TA6/6 (31 cases,81.6%),heterozygous mutant-type TA6/7 (2 cases,5.3%),homozygous mutant-type TA7/7(5 cases,13.2%); UGT1A1 * 6 wild-type G/G(28 cases,73.7%),heterozygous mutant-type G/A(8 cases,21.1%),homozygous mutant-type A/A(2 cases,5.3%).For the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 delayed diarrhea and neutropenia,the rates were significantly lower in patients of UGT1A1 * 28 TA6/6 wide-type genotype than those of TA6/7 and TA7/7 mutant-type genotypes(P 〈0.05).The rate was significantly lower in patients of UGT1A1 * 6 G/G genotype than that of G/A and A/A mutanttype genotypes (P 〈 0.05).No significant difference of either ORR or PFS was observed among different genotypes (P 〉 0.05).Conciusion For FOLFIRI regimen as second-line chemotherapy in mCRC patients,the UGT1A1 * 28 and UGT1A1 * 6 locus mutations can be regarded as predictors for irinotecan-associated severe delayed diarrhea and neutropenia,whereas no association between UGT1 A1 gene polymorphism and efficacy is observed.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2013年第11期990-995,共6页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
基金 安徽省科技攻关资助项目(12010402127 11010402169)
关键词 尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶1A1 基因多态性 伊立替康 转移性结直肠癌 Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 Gene polymorphism Irinotecan Metastatic colorectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Innocenti F,Undevia SD,Iyer L,et al.Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase1A1gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan[J].J Clin Oncol,2004,22 (8):1382-1388.
  • 2王岩,葛飞娇,林莉,郝光涛,沈琳,徐农,王金万,焦顺昌,徐建明.UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康为主方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的毒性和疗效的相关性分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2012,17(11):961-966. 被引量:21
  • 3Massacesi C,Terrazzino S,Marcucci F,et al.Uridine diphosphateglucuronosy transferase 1 A1 promoter polymorphism predicts the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue induced by irinotecan-based chemotherapy[J].Cancer,2006,106 (5):1007-1016.
  • 4Clarke D J,Moghrabi N,Monaghan G,et al.Genetic defects of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1 (UGT1) gene that cause familial non-haemolytic unconjugated hyperbilinemias[J].Clin Chim Acta,1997,266(1):63-74.
  • 5Kaniwa N,Kurose K,Jinno H,et al.Racial variability in haplotype frequencies of UGT1 A1 and glucuronidation activity of a novel single nucleotide polymorphism 686C > T(P229L) found in an African-American[J].Drug Metab Dispos,2005,33 (3):458-465.
  • 6王岩,徐建明,沈琳,徐农,王金万,焦顺昌,张京生,宋三泰,李健,包悍英,杨林,李方.中国人尿苷二磷酸葡糖苷酸转移酶1A基因多态性与伊立替康毒性的相关性[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2007,29(12):913-916. 被引量:43
  • 7Zhang A,Xing O,Qin S,et al.Intra-ethnic differences in genetic variants of the UGT-Glucuronosyltransferase 1 A1 gene in Chinese populations[J].Pharmacogenomics J,2007,7 (5):333-338.
  • 8Desai AA,lnnocenti F,Ratain M J,et al.Pharmacogenomics:road to anti-cancer therapeutics nirvana[J].Oncogene,2003,22(42):6621-6628.
  • 9Han JY,Lim HS,Park YH,et al.Integrated pharmacogenetic prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].Lung Cancer,2009,63(1):115-120.
  • 10Nakamura Y,SodaH,OkaM,etal.Randomized phase Ⅱ trial of irinotecan with paclitaxel or gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer:association of UGT1A1 * 6 and UGT1A1 * 27 with severe neutropenia[J].J Thorac Oncol,2011,6 (1):121-127.

二级参考文献13

  • 1徐建明.大肠癌内科治疗现状的认识和评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(12):705-707. 被引量:13
  • 2Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med, 2000, 343:905-914.
  • 3Cadini LE, Meropol NJ, Bever J, et al. UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms predict response and toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabineJirinotecan. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11:1226-1236.
  • 4Saeki M, Saito Y, Jinno H, et al. Haplotype structures of the UGT1A gene complex in a Japanese population. Pharmacogenomics J, 2006, 6:63-75.
  • 5Gagne JF, Montminy V, Belanger P, et al. Common human UGT1 A polymorphisms and the altered metabolism of irinotecan active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin ( SN-38 ). Mol Pharmacol, 2002,62:608-617.
  • 6Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C, et al. The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin udp-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in gilbert's syndrome. N Engl J Med, 1995, 333:1171-1175.
  • 7Yamanaka H, Nakajima M, Katoh M, et al. A novel polymorphism in the promoter region of human UGT1A9 gene ( UGT1A9 &*22) and its effects on the transcriptional activity. Pharmacogenetics, 2004, 14:329-332.
  • 8Marcuello E, Mtes A, Menoyo A, et al. UGT1 A1 gene variations and irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Br J Cancer, 2004, 91:678-682.
  • 9Han JY, Lira HS, Shin ES, et al. Comprehensive analysis of UGT1A polymorphisms predictive for pharmacokinetics and treatment outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with irinotecan and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24:2237-2244.
  • 10Ando Y, Saka H, Ando M, et al. Polymorphisms of UDPglucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Cancer Res, 2000, 60:6921-6926.

共引文献89

同被引文献68

  • 1Ikeguchi M, Arai Y, Maeta Y, et al. Topoisomerase I expression in tumors as a biological marker for CPT-11 chemoscnsitivity in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Surg Today, 2011, 41(9) : 1196-1199.
  • 2Calvo E, Cort6s J, Rodriguez J, et al. Irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouraciL/leucovorin combination chemotherapy in ad- vanced colorectalcarcinoma: a phase II study [ J 1. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2002 2(2) : 104-110.
  • 3Tang W, Su G, Li J, et al. Enhanced anti-colorectal cancer effects of carfilzomib combined with CPT-11 via downregulation of nuclear factor-KB in vitro and ill vivo[J]. Int J Oncol, 2014, 45 (3) :995-1010.
  • 4Eberle KE, Sansing HA, Szaniszlo P, et al. Carcinoma matrix controls resistance to cisplatin through talin regulation of NF-kB [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(6)[2014-10-17].http://www. ncbi.nlm, nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123362/.
  • 5Kubn DJ, Orlowski RZ, Bjorklund CC. Second generation pro- teasome inhibitors: earfilzomib and inhibitors ( IPSIs ) [J]. Curt Cancer (3) :285-295.
  • 6Zang Y, Thomas SM, Chan ET, et Drug Targets, 2011, 11 al. Carfilzomib and ONX0912 inhibit cell survival and tumor growth of head and neck cancer and their activities are enhanced by suppression of Mcl-1 or autophagy[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2012, 18(20) :5639-5649.
  • 7Dasmahapatra G, Lembersky D, Son MP, et al. Carfilzomib in- teracts synergistically with histone deacetylase inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo [ J ]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2011, 10(9) :1686-1697.
  • 8Pasquini L, Petronelli A, Petrucci E, et al. Primary ovarian cancer cells are sensitive to the proaptotie effects of proteasome inhibitors[ J]. Int J Oncol, 2010, 36(3):707-713.
  • 9Yang H, Zonder JA, Dou QP. Clinical development of novel pro- teasome inhibitors for cancer treatment [ J ]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2009, 18(7) :957-971.
  • 10Abaza MS, Bahman AM, A1-Attiyah R. Superior antimitogenic and chemosensitization activities of the combination treatment of the histone deacetylase inhibitor apieidin and proteasome inhibitors on human colorectal cancer cells [ J ]. Int J Oncol, 2014, 44(1) :105-128.

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部