摘要
现行刑事诉讼法将会见权仅定位为"律师会见权",具有局限性。完整意义上的会见权还应包括"在押犯罪嫌疑人、被告人要求会见辩护律师"。不仅如此,我国法律只承认犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的"被动性辩护权",即交由辩护律师行使的辩护权,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人作为辩护权的享有者,在很多场合都被剥夺了自行行使辩护权的机会,成为在行使辩护权利方面的"无行为能力人"。为确保被告人获得"有效辩护"的机会,并使被告人对律师辩护进行有效的督促,有必要确立"被告人的自主性辩护权",确保被告人有机会亲自行使会见权、阅卷权、申请调查权,从而与律师辩护权形成一种合力。
The limitation is obvious that current criminal procedure law just entitles the right of interview with the lawyer.But a more comprehensive meaning may contain defendant's right to request meeting the lawyer.In addition,the law only recognizes the passive right to counsel,which indicates that such right is exclusively exercised by the lawyer.While,as the original source of the right to counsel,suspects or defendants are always deprived of the autonomous right in many cases,disabling them to mere incompetent actors.In order to safeguard the right to effective counsel,and balance the allocation of this right,the autonomous right to counsel is imperative to ensure the defendant to interview the lawyer,read the case file and investigate and collect the evidence,so as to contribute to a integrated right to counsel.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期140-152,177-178,共13页
The Jurist
关键词
律师会见权
被告人会见权
被动性辩护权
自主性辩护权
Lawyer's Right to Interview
Defendant's Right to Meet
Passive Right to Counsel
Autonomous Right to Counsel