从付费方式的视角审视学术期刊开放存取出版模式

Questions on the access-opening publishing modes from the perspective of the academic journal publishing payment modes

开放存取(OA)运动历经10余年的发展,耗费巨大却成效甚微,日益背离其产生的初衷,需要相关各界反思。将信息数量、质量与传播作为学术期刊出版付费方式的评价要素,比较分析作者、读者、出版者付费方式的利弊后发现:以作者付费为基础的OA出版模式致使学术出版的研究成果质量难以得到保障;促使学术成果出版呈现出虚假的繁荣局面,造成社会公共资源的巨大浪费;太过理想化的自由、共享理念缺乏平衡作者、出版者和读者各方利益的基础和机制。

The access-opening movement has been developed for more than 10 years, with enormous cost yet little effect. It has increasingly deviated from its original intention, which definitely needs various reflections from all walks of life. Based on the evaluation on the academic journals＂ payment modes, based on study of the information quantity, quality and dissemination, as well as based on the pros and cons of the three payment modes-- authors, readers and publishers, the authors of this essay have found that the writer-based access-opening payment mode cannot guarantee the best quality of the academic publication. It has enhanced the false prosperity of the academic publishing, and created huge waste on social publish resources. And at the same time, too idealistic freedom and sharing ideas lack of balance from the basis and mechanisms originated from all parties of authors, publishers and readers.