期刊文献+

心理逻辑理论:心理语言假设和推理角色语义学的实证研究范式(英文) 被引量:1

Mental Logic Theory: A Paradigmatic Case for Empirical Research on the Language of Thought and Inferential Role Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 据Fodor[15]和Fodor&Pylyshyn[12]提出的"心理语言假设"认为,思维是以心理语言进行的;心理语言有一个由逻辑句法和逻辑语义组成的表征格式。据此而论,思维可以看作是这些表征的句法运算。本文认为,这一系统的语义表征可以很好地由推理角色语义学来说明,而Braine和O’Brien[3]的心理逻辑理论可以为心理语言运行的实证研究提供一个研究范式。 The Language of Thought Hypothesis, which follows from proposals of Fodor[ 15 ] and Fodor and Pylyshyn [ 12], proposes that thinking takes place in a mental language, which has a representational format consisting both of a logical syntax and a logical semantics. Thinking thus can be conceived of as a set of syntactic operations on such representations. We argue that the semantics of such a system is best provided by an inference role semantics and that the mental logic theory of Braine and O' Brien [ 3 ] can provide a paradigmatic case study in how the empirical inves- tigation of the language of thought can proceed.
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期27-41,共15页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 心理语言假设 推理角色语义学 心理逻辑理论 Language of Thought Hypothesis inferential role semantics: mental logic theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Block, N. Functional role and truth conditions [ J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LXI, 1987:157 - 181.
  • 2Braine, M. D. S. , Reiser, B. J. & B. Rumain. Some empirical justification for a theory of natural proposi- tional logic[ AJ. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in research and thinking[ C]. New York: Academic Press. 1984, (18) : 317 - 371.
  • 3Braine, M. D. S, & D.P. O' Brien(eds. ). Mental Logic[ C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
  • 4Braine, M. D. S. & O' Brien, D.P. A theory of if: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic princi- ples [J]. Psychological Review, 1991, (98): 182-203.
  • 5Braine, M. D. S. , O' Brien, D. P. , Noveck, I. A. , Samuels, M. , Lea, R. B. , Fisch, S. M. , & Y. Yang. Predicting intermediate and multiple conclusions in propositional logic inference problems: Further evidence for a mental logic [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, (1 24) : 263 -292.
  • 6Brandom, R. Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism[ M ]. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Universi- ty Press, 2000.
  • 7Bruner, J. Beyond the Information Given [ M]. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1973.
  • 8Davies, M. Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought [A]. in Ramsey,W. , Stich, S.P. & D E. Rumelhart (eds.). Philosophy and Connectionist Theory [ C ]. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991 229 - 257.
  • 9Davies, M. Connectionism, modularity, and tacit knowledge [J]. British Journal for the Philosophy of Sci- ence, 1989, (40): 541 - 555.
  • 10Field, H. Logic, meaning and conceptual role [ J ]. Journal of Philosophy, 1977, (69) : 379 - 408.

同被引文献17

  • 1洪流,吴桂霞.评Goodman的心理语言阅读模式[J].外语教学,1998,19(1):30-35. 被引量:20
  • 2高新民.思维语言假说:论证、批评与思考[J].社会科学战线,1995(6):44-52. 被引量:2
  • 3索绪尔.普通语言学教程[M].高名凯译,北京:商务印书馆,1980.
  • 4Burclffield, R. The English Language [M]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1985.
  • 5Chonasky, N. A review of B. F. Skinner' s verbal behavior[J]. Lan- guage, 1959(35) : 26-58.
  • 6Derrida, J. Of Grammatology [M]. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
  • 7Fodor, J. The Language of Thought[M]. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1975.
  • 8Fodor, J. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
  • 9Marr, D. Vision[M]. New York: Freeman, 1982.
  • 10Pinker, S. The Language Instinct[M]. New York: Harper Collins, 1994.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部