摘要
环境公益诉讼因缺乏有力立法支撑,处于一种司法实践先于立法的混乱局面。从对2007年—2012年国内公开报道的30起环境公益诉讼案件的司法裁判文书进行实证研究发现:环境公益诉讼无论诉讼目的还是救济方式均不同于传统诉讼,它是在原有诉讼体系上"重生"的一种新型诉讼;为实现维护环境公益的目的,这样一种新型诉讼的原告资格应赋予公民个人、环保团体、环境行政机关及检察机关,并且应由专门审判机关进行审理。
Due to the lack of strong legislative support, environmental public interest litigations are in disorder since judicial practice occurred prior to legislation. Based on an empirical research of 30 publicly re- ported judicial referee documents of 30 environmental public interest litigation from 2007 to 2012 in China, it is found that the environmental public interest litigation is different from the traditional litigation in litigation purpose and remedy measures; it is a new - born litigation type. In order to protect environmental public inter- est, the plaintiff qualification for this special litigation should be entitled to individual citizens, environmental groups, environmental protection administrative organs and the procuratorial organs, besides, such litigation should be judged by specialized judicial trials.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2013年第6期75-84,共10页
Northern Legal Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"环境影响评价的司法审查研究"(项目编号13XFX010)
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"生态环境保护的公益诉讼机制研究"(项目编号12JZD037)
环保部环保公益性行业科研专项项目"环境铅
镉污染的人群健康危害法律监管研究"(项目编号201109058)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
环境公益诉讼
原告资格
环保法庭
environmental public interest litigation plaintiff environmental courts