期刊文献+

Robust Texture Classification via Group-Collaboratively Representation-Based Strategy 被引量:1

Robust Texture Classification via Group-Collaboratively Representation-Based Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this paper, we present a simple but powerful ensemble for robust texture classification. The proposed method uses a single type of feature descriptor, i.e. scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), and inherits the spirit of the spatial pyramid matching model (SPM). In a flexible way of partitioning the original texture images, our approach can produce sufficient informative local features and thereby form a reliable feature pond or train a new class-specific dictionary. To take full advantage of this feature pond, we develop a group-collaboratively representation-based strategy (GCRS) for the final classification. It is solved by the well-known group lasso. But we go beyond of this and propose a locality-constraint method to speed up this, named local constraint-GCRS (LC-GCRS). Experimental results on three public texture datasets demonstrate the proposed approach achieves competitive outcomes and even outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Particularly, most of methods cannot work well when only a few samples of each category are available for training, but our approach still achieves very high classification accuracy, e.g. an average accuracy of 92.1% for the Brodatz dataset when only one image is used for training, significantly higher than any other methods. In this paper, we present a simple but powerful ensemble for robust texture classification. The proposed method uses a single type of feature descriptor, i.e. scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), and inherits the spirit of the spatial pyramid matching model (SPM). In a flexible way of partitioning the original texture images, our approach can produce sufficient informative local features and thereby form a reliable feature pond or train a new class-specific dictionary. To take full advantage of this feature pond, we develop a group-collaboratively representation-based strategy (GCRS) for the final classification. It is solved by the well-known group lasso. But we go beyond of this and propose a locality-constraint method to speed up this, named local constraint-GCRS (LC-GCRS). Experimental results on three public texture datasets demonstrate the proposed approach achieves competitive outcomes and even outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Particularly, most of methods cannot work well when only a few samples of each category are available for training, but our approach still achieves very high classification accuracy, e.g. an average accuracy of 92.1% for the Brodatz dataset when only one image is used for training, significantly higher than any other methods.
出处 《Journal of Electronic Science and Technology》 CAS 2013年第4期412-416,共5页 电子科技学刊(英文版)
关键词 Dictionary learning group lasso localconstraint spatial pyramid matching textureclassification. Dictionary learning, group lasso, localconstraint, spatial pyramid matching, textureclassification.
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Y. Xu, X. Yang, H. Ling, and H. Ji, "A new texturedescriptor using multifractal analysis in multi-orientation wavelet pyramid," in Proc. of 1EEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, 2010, pp. 161-168.
  • 2L. Liu, P. Fieguth, G. Kuang, and H. Zha, "Sorted random projections for robust texture classification," in Proc, of JEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, Barcelona, 2011, pp. 391-398.
  • 3S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce, "A sparse texture representation using local affine regions," IEEE Trans.on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 8, pp 1265-1278, 2005.
  • 4J.-G. Zhang, M. Marszalek, S. Lazebnik, and C. Schmid, "Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: a comprehensive study," in Proc. of Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, doi 10.1109/CVPRW.2006.121.
  • 5M. Crosier and L. D. Griffin, "Use basic image features for texture classification," Int. Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 447-460, 2010.
  • 6S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce, "Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognition natural scene categories," in Proc. of lEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.68.
  • 7J. Wright, A.-. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y. Ma, "Robust face recognition via sparse representation," 1EEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210-227, 2008.
  • 8D. G. Lowe, "Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints," lnt. Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91-110, 2004.
  • 9J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang, "Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification," in Proc. of lEEE Conf. on Computer sion and Pattern Recognition, Miami, 2009, pp. 1794-1801.
  • 10K F.-JI J.-J. Wang, J.-C. Yang, Yu, and Lv, T. Huang, and Y. Gong, "Locality-Constrained linear coding for image classification," in Proc. of lEEE Conf. on Computer Fsion and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, 2010, pp. 3360-3367.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部