期刊文献+

不同年龄段IgA肾病患者的肾脏病理特征性变化分析 被引量:7

Analysis of renal pathological characteristic changes in the different age groups of patients with IgA nephropathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 通过对不同年龄段IgA肾病患者的肾脏病理分析,探讨肾脏病理改变在不同年龄阶段是否存在特征性改变.方法 原发性IgA肾病149例按患者年龄分为4组(A组0~20岁,B组21~40岁,C组41~60岁,D组60岁以上),参考Katafuchi IgA肾病积分标准和牛津分类标准对其肾脏病理改变与免疫荧光特点进行分析研究.结果 两种方法显示结果基本一致,肾组织病理改变积分以A组最低,积分均从A组、B组、C组逐渐增加.A组IgA荧光强度显著高于C组和D组(P<0.05);D组IgM荧光强度明显低于A组(P<0.05).结论 即IgA肾病的病理改变与年龄有相关性,60岁前随着年龄增长肾脏损伤程度逐渐加重.20岁以下IgA肾病患者,免疫物质沉积强度强,推测免疫因素可能参与肾损伤的作用大且程度重,但病理改变最轻,可能预后最好. Objective To explore the renal pathological characteristic changes in the different age groups of patients with IgA nephropathy. Methods According to age, 149 cases of primary IgA nephropathy were randomized into 4 groups (A group for 0 to 20 years old,B group for 21 to 40 years old, C group for 41 to 60 years old, D group beyond 60 years old). The renal pathological changes and immune fluorescence characteristics were compared by Katafuehi reference standard and Oxford classification standard of IgA nephropathy. Results The two methods showed the similar results. The scores of renal histopathologic changes in group A were lowest, followed by group B, and group C. Immune fluorescence intensity of IgA in group A was significantly stronger than that in groups C and D (P〈0. 05), and immune fluorescence intensity of IgM in group D was obviously weaker than that in group A (P〈0. 05). Conclusions The pathological changes of the IgA nephropathy has a correlation with age. With the age increasing, the kidney injury is aggravated gradually (60 years ago). The immune factors play roles in the renal injury of IgA nephropathy patients under the age of 20 largely and heavily, but the renal pathological changes are mild, and the prognosis may be best.
出处 《临床肾脏病杂志》 2013年第11期515-518,共4页 Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
基金 广西卫生厅面上项目(NO.GZKZ1150)
关键词 IGA肾病 肾脏病理 年龄 IgA nephropathy Renal pathology Age
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献66

共引文献49

同被引文献36

  • 1吕继成,张宏,刘刚,江建青,王海燕.IgA肾病呈单纯血尿和(或)轻度蛋白尿临床病理分析[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2004,20(6):418-420. 被引量:46
  • 2鲍浩,黎磊石,刘志红,孙骅,张馨,陈惠萍,曾彩虹,郑春霞.不同类型IgA肾病的临床病理比较[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2006,15(5):409-415. 被引量:35
  • 3邓金华,王定勇,甘晓辉,宋晓英,王松,张林.血尿和轻度蛋白尿IgA肾病临床病理分析[J].四川医学,2007,28(9):1004-1005. 被引量:1
  • 4Rekola S, Bergstrand A, Bueht H, et al. Deterioration ofGFR in IgA nephropathy as measured by Cr-EDTA clearance [J]. Kidney Int, 1991, 40(4): 1050-1054.
  • 5D'Amieo C. Natural history of idioPathic IgA nephropathy: role of clinical and histological prognostic factors[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2000, 36(2): 227-237.
  • 6Katz SM. Renal disease. Classification and atlas of glomerular diseases[J]. JAMA, 1982, 248(16): 2053-2054.
  • 7Lee SM,Rao VM, Frankin WA,et al. IgA nephropathy: mop phologic predictors of progressive renal disease [J].Human Pathology, 1982, 3(4): 314-322.
  • 8Roberts IS, Cook HT, Troyanov S, et al. The Oxford classifi- cation of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correla- tions, and reproducibility[J]. Kidney In, 2009, 76(5): 546- 556.
  • 9Vivante A, Afek A, Frenkel-Nir Y, et al, Persistent asymp- tomatic isolated microscopic hematuria in Israeli adolescents and young adults and risk for end-stage renal disease[J]. JA- MA, 2001, 306(7): 729-736.
  • 10Szeto CC, Lai FM, To KF, et al. The natural history of im- munoglobulin a nephropathy among patients with hematuria and minimal proteinuria[J]. Am J Med, 2001, 110: 434-437.

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部