EPR论证的哲学思考

EPR's Argument

EPR论证从哲学假设出发,运用思想实验,通过逻辑推理,来质疑量子力学的完备性,但却没有得到实验结果的支持。这个案例表明,量子力学不是对经典物理学的补充和扩展。我们只有从认识论意义上,才能理解微观粒子的存在状态与共轭粒子的非定域特征。物理学家围绕EPR论证展开的研究与讨论,不仅开创了实验的形而上学,把表面上互不相关的哲学领域与实验领域联系起来,而且揭示了从传统自然哲学的本体论的思维方式转向认识论的思维方式的迫切性与重要性。

EPR＇s Argument is to question about the completeness of quantum mechanics by logical inference using an experiment in the mind based on the philosophical hypothesis. However, it can not be supported by the results of experiments~ This case indicates that quantum mechanics is not the supplement and extension of classical mechanics. We can understand the state of microcosmic particle and nonlocal property of conjugated particles only from the perspective of epistemology. The physicists ＇ research and debate on EPR＇s Argument not only creates the metaphysics of experiment and relates the field of philosophy to the area of experiment, but also uncovers the pressing and important from ontological ways of thinking in the traditional natural philosophy to epistemological ways of thinking.