期刊文献+

不同依恋风格者对情绪面孔的加工 被引量:8

Attachment Styles and the Processing of Emotion Faces
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对情绪面孔的加工可以反映出不同依恋风格者在社会交往中的应对风格。对依恋风格的划分现在常用的是类型法和维度法两种方法。在依恋风格影响情绪面孔加工方面有4种新的实验范式,分别是渐变任务、知觉阈限任务、眼部照片任务和空间线索范式。目前,各项研究的结论都显示,不同的依恋风格者对来自外界的情绪性信息有着各自不同的加工方式。对神经生理机制的研究进一步印证了行为研究的结论,并发现大脑对情绪面孔的反应不仅仅受到面孔特征的影响,它还取决于社会情境中情绪面孔的具体意义。将威胁性信息和安全感建立联结,是改变不安全依恋风格的一种方法。基于现有研究的不足,未来的研究可有多个努力方向。 The processing of emotion faces reflects the coping styles of individuals with different attachment styles during social interaction. Attachment styles are now often being conceptualized by researchers in terms of a two-dimension model or a four-category model. Regarding the emotion face processing of people with different attachment styles, there are four new experimental paradigms, namely, morph task, perceptual threshold task, RMET and spatial cueing task. The findings of these studies all indicate that people with different attachment styles tend to have different ways in processing emotional information from the outside. Researches centered on the neurophysiological mechanism have further confirmed the conclusions from behavioral studies, and they have also found that the brain's reaction to emotion faces is influenced not only by the features of the faces, but also by the meaning of the faces in social context. Linking threatening information to one's sense of security might be a way to alter one's insecure attachment style. Based on the limitations of the existing researches, future studies may have multiple research possibilities.
作者 钟歆 陈旭
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期2154-2163,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 依恋风格 情绪面孔 实验范式 神经生理机制 attachment style emotion face experimental paradigms neurophysiological mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献97

  • 1Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development,41, 49-67.
  • 2Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a "language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults,and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311-331.
  • 3Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y.,& Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42,241-251.
  • 4Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
  • 5Beckes, L.,Simpson, J. A., & Erickson, A. (2010). Of snakes and succor: Learning secure attachment associations with novel faces via negative stimulus pairings. Psychological Science, 21, 721-728.
  • 6Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  • 7Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
  • 8Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
  • 9Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measures of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • 10Calvo, M. G.,& Eysenck, M. W. (2000). Early vigilance and late avoidance of threat processing: Repressive coping versus low1high anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 763-787.

同被引文献98

引证文献8

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部