期刊文献+

城市暴雨强度公式拟合方法研究 被引量:25

Study on fitting methods for urban storm intensity formula
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统方法确定暴雨强度总公式的参数需要经过理论频率曲线拟合和总公式参数拟合两个环节,但由此法求得的暴雨强度总公式拟合实测雨强样本的误差平方和不为最小。本文采用非线性回归方法,研究了暴雨强度总公式直接拟合实测雨强样本的直接拟合法,使所求总公式拟合实测雨强样本的误差平方和为最小,实现了总公式参数的直接寻优。结合两个实例,对直接拟合法与采用不同理论频率分布的传统方法进行了比较,结果表明,直接拟合法切实可行,不仅使拟合精度提高,而且减少了不同理论频率曲线的选择与拟合环节,可避免推求暴雨强度总公式参数的任意性。 Conventional method for determining the parameters of the storm intensity multi-period formula usually consists of two fitting processes, fitting the theory frequency curve and fitting the parameters of storm intensity multi-period formula. By such way to fit samples of the observed storm intensity, sum of squared error cannot reach the minimum. In this paper, a direct fitting method for storm intensity multi-pe- riod formula has been studied by nonlinear regression to directly fit the samples. With the storm intensity multi-period formula obtained by the direct fitting method, the minimum sum of squared error can be ac- quired in the process of fitting samples of observed storm intensity, and the best parameters are directly es- timated. Combined two examples, the direct fitting method were compared with the conventional methods by using different theory frequency curve. The results indicate that the direct fitting method is feasible, which can increase the fitting accuracy, decrease the processes of choosing and fitting for different theory frequen- cy curve, and avoid arbitrariness of deriving parameters for the storm intensity multi-period formula.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1263-1271,共9页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 住房和城乡建设部2011年科学技术项目(2011-K7-20) 2012年江苏省住房和城乡建设厅项目(ZD13)
关键词 暴雨强度总公式 非线性回归 误差平方和 直接拟合法 传统方法 理论频率分布 storm intensity multi-period formula nonlinear regression error sum of squares direct fittingmethod conventional method theory frequency distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献43

共引文献200

同被引文献228

引证文献25

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部