期刊文献+

髋关节表面置换术后股骨近端及髋臼骨密度初步研究 被引量:2

A priliminary study of bone mineral densities of the proximal femur and acetabulum after hip resurfacing arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价髋关节表面置换术(RSAH)对股骨近端及髋臼侧骨量的影响.方法 选择符合入组标准的单侧RSAH病人26例,于术后1年行髋关节手术侧及健侧的股骨近端和髋臼的骨密度检查,参考Taylor及Wilkinson方法分别将术后股骨近端及髋臼分为6个(1~6区)和3个(A1~A3)兴趣区,测量各兴趣区骨密度,用t检验对各区手术侧与健侧骨密度值进行比较.结果 手术侧的股骨近端5、6区的骨密度值大于健侧的,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);1、2、3、4区的骨密度值在手术侧与健侧间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).髋臼侧全部区域中髋臼头侧(A1区)密度值,手术侧小于健侧,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);手术侧与健侧的髋臼内侧及尾侧(A2、A3区)的骨密度比较,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 关节表面置换术后股骨近端骨量可以得到有效保存和恢复,而髋臼侧骨质有丢失可能. Objective To evaluate periprosthetic bone mineral densities of the femur and acetabulum after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (RSAH). Methods A comparative study was carried out in 26 patients who underwent RSAH. The bone mineral density was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry 1 year after RSAH. Both the operated and unoperated hips were scanned. In the dual femur bone mineral density analysis, 9 regions of interests (ROIs) were defined: ROIs 1-6 were determined according to Taylor regions; ROIs A1-A3 were determined according to Wilkinson regions. The Student t test was used for comparing differences in bone mineral density between the operated and unoperated sides. Results The bone mineral densities of the proximal femur in ROIs 5 and 6 medial to the stem were significantly increased in the operated side compared to the unoperated side (P〈0.05), but no significant differences were found in ROIs 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the proximal femur between two sides (P〉0.05). The bone mineral density of acetabulum in cranial ROI A1 of the operated side was significantly decreased compared to the unoperated side (P〈0.05), while in the medial and caudal ROIs A2 and A3 showed no significantly differences between two sides (P〉0.05). Conclusion The bone stock of proximal femur can be well preserved and recovered after RSAH.
出处 《国际医学放射学杂志》 2013年第6期514-516,524,共4页 International Journal of Medical Radiology
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金(2011KY06)
关键词 髋关节 表面置换术 骨密度 X线吸收法 Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty Bone mineral density X-ray absorptiometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1李文正,安占天.MOM髋关节表面置换术治疗AS累及髋关节效果观察(附21例报告)[J].山东医药,2011,51(26):108-109. 被引量:8
  • 2翁益平,张云坤,郁忠杰.全髋关节表面置换术29例近期临床效果的观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2010,14(3):99-101. 被引量:3
  • 3McBryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM, et al. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010,92:105-112.
  • 4Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head[J]. Proc Inst Meeh Eng H, 2006,220:289-297.
  • 5Malviya A, Ng L, Hashmi M, et al. Patterns of changes in femoral bone mineral density up to five years after hip resurfacing [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013,28:1025-1030.
  • 6Wilkinson JM, Peel NF, Elson RA, et al. Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001,83:283-288.
  • 7Smolders JM, Pakvis DF, Hendrickx BW, et al. Periacetabular bone mineral density changes after resurfaeing hip arthroplasty versus conventional total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled DEXA study [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013,28:1177-1184.
  • 8Cohen B , Rushton N. Accuracy of Dexa measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty [J] . Bone Joint Surg, 1995,7:479-483.
  • 9Trevisan C, Gandolini GG, Sibilla P, et al. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation [J]. Bone Min Res, 1992,7: 1373-1381.
  • 10Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L, et al. Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems [J]. Acta Orthop, 2009,80:291-297.

二级参考文献50

共引文献12

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部