期刊文献+

《唐律疏议》所见唐代审判责任制度 被引量:1

The System of Trial Responsibility Reflected in Tanglvshuyi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《唐律疏议》把案件的误判情况分为"故出""故入""失出""失入"四种类型,并规定了处罚原则。案件判决实行连署制度,联署判案出现误判,则分为"同职犯公坐"和"同职有私余官不觉"两种类型,连署之官根据自身在四等官制中的地位,负相应的连带责任。 Misjudge Cases were divided into four types in Tanglvshuyi (Comment on Law ot tang Dynasty), Severer Sentence than Justice out of Personal Advantage, Lighter Sentence than Justice out of Per- sonal Advantage, Consciously Severer Sentence and Consciously Lighter Sentence than Justice. Those punishments were prescribed respectively. The system of joint signature was implemented in the process of trial. The misjudge cases could be classified into two types: one was Colleague's Unconscious Error, and the other is Colleague's Error out of Personal Considerations. When there were misjudge eases, the officials who had signed in records had to assume responsibility respectively according to the regulations prescribed in Tanglvshuyi.
作者 曹鹏程
出处 《唐都学刊》 2013年第6期53-56,共4页 Tangdu Journal
关键词 唐律疏议 审判责任 放出 故人 失出 失入 Tanglvshuyi trial responsibility Severer Sentence than Justice out of Personal Advantage Lighter Sentence than Justice out of Personal Advantage Consciously Severer Sentence than Justice Con-sciously Lighter Sentence than Justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1长孙无忌等.唐律疏议[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 2李林甫等.唐六典[M].北京:中华书局,1992.
  • 3王溥.唐会要[M].北京:中华书局,1955..
  • 4刘俊文.唐律疏议笺解[M].北京:中华书局,1996..

共引文献453

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部