期刊文献+

庭审语篇中模糊限制语的商讨性

Negotiability of Hedges in Courtroom Discourse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阐述了庭审语境中模糊限制语的商讨属性,分析了选择模糊限制语的动态商讨过程,指出庭审中模糊限制语的选择是说者和听者在一系列语境因素间商讨的结果,在商讨过程中主要受到合作原则、礼貌策略和语篇连贯等原则或策略的灵活性制约。 This paper illustrates the properties of hedge negotiation in courtroom context and analyzes the dynamic process of hedge negotiation. Based on the analysis, the paper demonstrates that the choice of hedges in courtroom discourse is mainly made flexibly upon principles or strat- egies such as cooperative principle, politeness strategy and discourse coherence.
作者 崔凤娟
出处 《大连民族学院学报》 CAS 2013年第6期645-649,共5页 Journal of Dalian Nationalities University
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(10YJC740016) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(ZJ13RWYB011)
关键词 模糊限制语 庭审语篇 商讨性 hedge courtroom discourse negotiability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1VERSCHUEREN J.Understanding Pragmatics[M].London:Edward Arnold,1999:55-56.
  • 2GRICE H P.Logic and conversation[C]//P COLE and MORGAN J.Syntax and Semantics.New York:Academic Press,1975:45.
  • 3FRASER B.Acquiring sicial competence in a second language[J].RELC Journal,1978(9):1-21.
  • 4BROWN P.LEVINSON S.Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage[M].Cambridge:CUP,1987:129.
  • 5H(U)BLER A.Understatements and Hedges in English[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1983.
  • 6MYERS G.The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles[M].Duisburg:LAUD,1988.
  • 7LINDE C.The quantitative study of communicative success:Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse[J].Language in Society,1988(17):380.
  • 8TIERSMA P.Legal Language[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1999:165.
  • 9COULTHARD M.JOHNSON A.An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics:Language in Evidence[M].London:Routledge,2007:115.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部