期刊文献+

基于成本-碳排放权衡的物流网络设计问题研究 被引量:8

Trade-Offs between Cost and Carbon Emissions in Logistics Network Design
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着节能减排政策的实施,许多企业在设计物流网络时开始考虑对环境的影响。研究了基于成本-碳排放权衡的物流网络设计问题,提出一个多目标整数规划模型来确定物流中心的个数、位置、客户区指派到物流中心的策略以及为客户区分配的车辆类型和车辆数量。应用标准化正规化约束法求解多目标问题的Pareto前沿。通过一个实例,说明标准化正规化约束法求解多目标问题的有效性,分析了物流成本与碳排放之间的权衡关系,得到的Pareto前沿表明增加较少的物流成本,能够较大程度地降低碳排放。最后,对影响模型的重要参数做了灵敏度分析,得出影响物流成本和碳排放的主要因素。 With the implementation of energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction,many enterprises take the impacts on the environment into consideration in the design of logistics network.This paper addresses logistics network design problem based on trade-offs between cost and carbon emissions.A multi-objective integer programming which optimizes the cost and carbon emissions simultaneously is developed to determine the numbers and locations of the logistics center,the assignment of customer areas to the logistics center and the vehicle types and the number of vehicles to each customer areas.Then we use normalized normal constraint method to solve the multi-objective programming to get Pareto frontier.The test result validates that the performance of the normalized normal constraint method is effective.We analyzed trade-off relations between the logistics cost and carbon emissions.The Pareto frontier show that we can reduce the carbon emission greatly with smaller sacrifice in logistics cost.Finally,the sensitivity analysis is conducted for important parameters of the model.We get the main factors that affect the logistics cost and carbon emissions.
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期61-66,73,共7页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871044 71172093) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC630331)
关键词 碳排放 多目标规划 标准化正规化约束法 PARETO前沿 carbon emissions multi-objective programming normalized normal constraint method pareto frontier
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1姜大立,杜文.基于遗传算法的物流配送中心选址模型[J].物流技术,1997,16(5):3-6. 被引量:39
  • 2Barahona F,Jensen D.Plant location with minimum inventory[J].Mathematical Prograrming,1998,83:101-111.
  • 3Owen S H,Daskin M S.Strategic facility location:A review[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1998,111:423-447.
  • 4陆化普,王超.两层次物流中心规划模型求解的遗传算法[J].土木工程学报,2001,1(1):1-5.
  • 5Sheu J B,Chou Y H,Hu C C.An integrated logistic operational model for green supply chain management[J].Transportation Research Part E,2005,41 (4):287-313.
  • 6Paksoy T.Optimizing a supply chain network with emission trading factor[J].Scientific Research and Essays,2010,5 (17):2535-2546.
  • 7Bevilacqua M,Bevilacqua M,Ciarapica F E et al.A carbon footprint analysis in the textile supply chain[J].International Journal of Sustainable Engineering,2010,4 (1),24-36.
  • 8Paksoy T,Bektas T,Ozceylan K Operational and environmental performance measures in a multiproduct closed-loop supply chain[J].Transportation Research Part E,2011,47(4):532-546.
  • 9Wang F,Lai X F,Shi N.A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design[J].Decision Support Systems,2011,51 (2):262-269.
  • 10Elhedhli S,Merrick R.Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J].Transportation Research Part D,2012,17(5):370-379.

二级参考文献36

  • 1李艳波,刘松先.信息不对称下政府主管部门与食品企业的博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(z1):197-200. 被引量:17
  • 2张保银,汪波,吴煜.基于循环经济模式的政府激励与监督问题[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(1):136-141. 被引量:69
  • 3Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 4香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 5魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 6Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 7Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 8Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 9Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 10Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.

共引文献519

同被引文献98

  • 1刘延锋,李小春,白冰.中国CO_2煤层储存容量初步评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(16):2947-2952. 被引量:79
  • 2李小春,刘延锋,白冰,方志明.中国深部咸水含水层CO_2储存优先区域选择[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):963-968. 被引量:112
  • 3贺竹磬,孙林岩.我国区域物流相对有效性分析[J].科研管理,2006,27(6):144-150. 被引量:37
  • 4刘延锋,李小春,方志明,白冰.中国天然气田CO_2储存容量初步评估[J].岩土力学,2006,27(12):2277-2281. 被引量:44
  • 5Walsh J A,O Kelly M E. An Information TheoreticApproach to Measurement of Apatial Inequality[J].Econ. Soc.Rev.,1979(10):267-286.
  • 6Huang M, Smilowitz K, Balcik B. Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and effieacy[J]. General Information, 2012, 48(4):2-18.
  • 7Hooker N J. Optimality conditions for distributive justice[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2010, 17 (4) : 485-505.
  • 8Bonald T, Massouli6 L, Prouti6re A, et al. A queueing analysis o{ max-min fairness, proportional {airness andbalanced fairness [J]. Queueing Systems, 2006,53 (1-2) : 65-84.
  • 9Bertsimas D, Farias V F, Trichakis N. On the Efficiency- Fairness Trade-off [J ]. Management Science, 2012, 58 ( 12 ) : 2234-2250.
  • 10Hooker N J, Williams P H. Combining Equity and Utilitarianism in a Mathematical Programming Model [J ]. Management Science, 2012,58(9) : 1682-1693.

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部