期刊文献+

有机化合物吸着系数(Koc)估算模型比较 被引量:1

Comparison of KOC prediction models on the based of fragment Constants and molecular connectivity indices
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于 592种化合物的Koc实测数据 ,分别采用片段常数法和分子连接性指数法建立了其估算模型 .根据模型残差分析了两种模型的预测误差 ,并运用 2种方式的jackknife检验比较了它们的稳健性 .片段常数模型涉及较多变量 ,其应用受到有限的已知片段常数以及烦琐的片段划分过程的限制 ,相比之下 ,分子连接性指数模型变量数较少 ,其应用时只需了解化合物的结构式 .片段常数模型的估算精度略高于分子连接性指数模型 ,两者的差别主要体现在logKoc<1和logKoc >4的化合物上 .分子连接性指数模型的稳健性比片段常数模型高 .在依次删除一类特定类别化合物时 ,其估算误差的变异幅度均小于片段常数模型 . Two modeling approaches, namely fragment constant (FC) and molecular connectivity indices (MCI), were compared for their accuracy and robustness in predicting soil adsorption coefficient ( Koc ). The criteria of the comparison were regression residuals. Jackknife test was thus applied for the robustness evaluation. The results showed that the FC model was better than the MCI one in terms of estimation accuracy, especially for the chemicals with log Koc smaller than 1 and greater than 4. On the other hand, the MCI model was more robust than the FC one as far as the sensitivity of output to input is considered.
出处 《土壤通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2000年第4期166-170,共5页 Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基金 自然科学基金重点项目! (496 32 0 6 0 ) 国家杰出青年基金项目资助! (495 2 5 1 0 2 )
关键词 吸着系数 片段常数法 土壤 有机化合物 估算模型 Sorption coefficient, Koc Fragment constant Molecular connectivity indices Robustness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Gawlik B M, Sotiriou N, Feicht E A, Schulte-Hostede S, Kettrup A. Alternatives for the determination of the soil adsorption coefficient, Koc, of non-ionic organic compounds-a review. Chemosphere, 1997, 34:2525~2551
  • 2[2]A Sabljic. QSAR modelling of soil sorption, improvements and systematics of log Koc vs. log Kow correlation. Chemosphere, 1995, (31):4489~4514
  • 3[3]Meylan W, Howard, P H. Molecular topology / fragment contribution method for predicting soil sorption coefficients. Environ Sci & Technol, 1992, 26:1560~1567
  • 4[4]W Karrickhoff. Organic pollutants sorption in aquatic systems. J. Hydraulic Engineering, 1984, 110:707~735
  • 5[5]Leo A J. Octanol/water partition coefficient. In Lyman W J, Rosenblatt D H. eds. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Method. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1982. 1~54
  • 6[6]Sabljic H, Gusten H, Verhaar H, Hermens J. QSAR modeling of soil sorption, improvements and systematics of log Koc correlations. Chemosphere, 1995, 31:4489~4514
  • 7[7]Kenaga E E, Goring C A. Relationship between water solubility, soil sorption, octanol-water partitioning,and concentration of chemicals in biota. In: Eaton J G, Parish P P, Hendricks A C. eds. Aquatic Toxicology, Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology. ASTM, STP 707,Philadelphia, 1980. 78~115
  • 8[8]Briggs G G. A simple relationship between soil sorption of organic chemicals and their Octanol-water partitioning behavior. Proc 7th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conf, 1973. 11:475~478
  • 9[9]Briggs G G. Theoretical and experimental relationships between soil adsorption, octanol-water partition coefficients, water solubilities, bioconcentration factors, and the parachor. J Agric Food Chem, 1981, 29:1050~1059
  • 10[10]Karickhoff S W, Brown D S, Scott T A. Sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments. Water Res, 1979, 13:241~248

共引文献4

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部