期刊文献+

公司治理的路径演化和路径选择 被引量:18

Path Evolution and Path Selection of Corporate Governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 公司治理路径演化是由行动主体、行动客体以及外部环境共同决定的复杂过程,路径依赖和路径创造是公司治理演化到一定阶段所出现的两种路径选择。本文从行动主体多样性、演化路径动态性以及外部环境多变性三个视角分析了公司治理的演化过程,探讨了不同阶段影响公司治理路径演化和选择的主要因素,并构建了公司治理的演化博弈模型。研究结果表明,行动主体的预期收益、风险偏好及利益集团势力对比、认知能力、路径发展阶段和转换成本、外部环境等是影响公司治理路径选择的重要因素;在公司治理路径演化的不同阶段上,路径依赖的程度和公司治理效率是不同的,随着路径的演化,路径依赖的程度呈递增趋势,而公司治理效率先上升后下降,呈抛物线形。在上述研究基础上,本文针对中国公司治理现状,从行动主体、行动客体和外部环境三个方面,就提高预期收益和认知能力、分化或瓦解既得利益集团、设计和选择演化路径、改善外部治理环境等提出了一些对策建议。 Path evolution of corporate governance is a complex process codetermined by action agent,action object and external environments. Path dependence and path creation are two kinds of path selection when corporate governance evolves at a certain stage. This paper, from the perspectives of diversity of action agent, dynamics of path evolution and variability of external environments, analyzes the evolution process of corporate governance, explores the main factors influencing path evolution and path selection at different stages of corporate governance development, and builds a model of evolutionary game of corporate governance. The research shows that transfer costs, expected benefits, risk preference and cognitive capacity of agents, power of interest groups, and external environments are important factors that affect path selection of corporate governance. Moreover, at different stage of path development, the degree of path dependence and the efficiency of corporate governance are different. The degree of path dependence is increasing with the path development, while the efficiency of corporate governance appears as a parabolic curve. Based on above, from the aspects of action agent, action object and external environments, we provides some approaches and suggestions with regard to the status quo of Chinese corporate $overnance practice, involving enhancing agents' expected benefit and cognitive ability, splitting or disintegrating vested interest group, designing and selecting evolutionary path, improving governance environments, and the like.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期78-90,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“新组织理论和组织治理研究”(批准号11&ZD153) 国家社会科学基金一般项目“复杂组织目标和效能评估研究”(批准号13BCL004)
关键词 公司治理 演化博弈 路径依赖 路径创造 制度变迁 corporate governance evolutionary game path dependence path creation institutional change
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Aguilera, R. V .A., and G.Jackson. The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Detenninants[J]. Academy of Management, 2003,28(3).
  • 2Aoki, M., G.Jackson, and H. Miyajima. Corporate Governance inJapan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • 3Y oshikawa, T., and A. A. Rasheed. Convergence of Corporate Governance Review and Future Directions[J]. Corporate Governance, 2009, 17(3).
  • 4Roe, MJ. Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1996,(109).
  • 5Bebchuk , L. A., and M.J. Roe. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance[J]. Stanford Law Review, 1999,(52).
  • 6Gugler, K., D. C. Mueller, and B. B. Yurtoglu. Corporate Governance and Globalization[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2004,(20).
  • 7Jackson, G. TheJapanese Finn and Its Diversity[J]. Economy and Society, 2009,(38).
  • 8Zhong, L.Y., and P.N. Grabosky. The Pluralization of Policing and the Rise of Private in China[J]. Crime, Law and Social Change, 2009,52(5).
  • 9Blodgett,M.S. and S.A.Kane. Global Corporate Governance: Implications for A Functionally Harmonized Legal Infrastructure[J].Journal of Business & Economics, 2011,(1).
  • 10Matoussi,H., and M.K.Jardak. International Corporate Governance and Finance: Legal, Cultural and Polo tical Explanations[J]. The InternationalJournal of Accounting, 2012,47(1).

二级参考文献39

  • 1Arrow, K. J. (2004),"Path dependence and competitive equilibrium", in: T. W. Guinnane et al(eds), History Matters, Stanford University Press.
  • 2Beyer, J. (2010), "The same or not the same: On the variety of mechanisms of path dependence", International Journal of Social Sciences 5 (1) : 1 - 11.
  • 3Boas, T. C. (2007), "Conceptualizing continuity and change: The composite- standard model of path dependence", Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(1) : 33- 54.
  • 4Brenner & Fornahl (2008)," Regional path - dependence in start-up activity", Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography No. 01-21.
  • 5David, P. A. (2001),"Path dependence, its critics and the quest for 'historical economics'", in& Garrouste & Ioannides(eds), Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas, Edward Elgar.
  • 6Djelic & Quack ( 2&007), " Overcoming path dependency", Theory and Society 36(2) : 161 - 186.
  • 7Ebbinghaus, B. (2005),"Can path dependence explain institutional change?", MPIFG Discussion Paper No. 01-31.
  • 8Garud & Karnoe(2001) (eds), Path Dependence and Creation, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  • 9Garud, Kumaraswamy & Karnoe(2010), "Path dependence & 911 or path creation. Journal of Management Studies 47(4): 760-774.
  • 10Goldstone, J. A. (1998), "Initial conditions, general laws, path dependence, and explanation in historical sociology",American Journal of Sociology 104(3) :829-845.

共引文献103

引证文献18

二级引证文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部