大学排名研究不能基于“简单化”数学处理——质疑《基于公信力视角的大学排名研究》

University Ranking Research Should Not Be Based on Simplification——Questioning the Reasoning of Study of University Rankings Based on Credibility Perspective

对中国科学技术大学大学评价课题组论文《基于公信力视角的大学排名研究——对〈2010中国大学评价〉,指标体系及其算法的质疑》"复演复算"的数学推理进行分析,考察其结论的基础。(1)原文中"复演复算"的数学基础是错误地对"本科生培养得分"进行了"简单化"处理;(2)"简单化"使原文所论的"本科生培养得分"与《2010中国大学评价》中的"本科生培养得分"成为两个基本不相干的数量项;(3)"在实际中将‘质量’指标,偷换成‘数量’指标概念"和"最终将‘大学本科毕业生数量’规模相应传导至‘本科生培养得分’"等问题是"简单化"造成的,这些质疑不应"简单化"地转嫁到中国大学评价体系上;(4)原文给出的中国大学数据不支持其结论。

Using the method of analyzing the reasoning process of'examination'in Study of University Rankings Based on Credibility Perspective-Doubtable about the Index System and the Algorithm of '2010 China University Evaluation'by University of Science and Technology of China,University Evaluation Task Force,this paper investigates the foundation of the conclusion in the aforesaid paper.(1)In the aforesaid paper,the mathematic base of the'examination'is a wrong'simplification'of'the scores of undergraduate teaching';(2)The'simplification'makes the'scores of undergraduate teaching'in 2010 China University Evaluation and the ones in the aforesaid paper become two irrelevant items;(3)The questions of'In practice they mew the'quality 'index to the conception of'quantity'index'and'Finally they accordingly transmit the'quantity of undergraduate'scope to'score of undergraduate teaching'and so on arise from the'simplification' and these questions shouldn't be'simply'transferred to the China University Evaluation System;(4)In the aforesaid paper,the data couldn't support its conclusion.