期刊文献+

美托洛尔联合硝苯地平对76例高血压患者的治疗体会 被引量:3

Treatment experience of metoprolol combined with nifedipine in the treatment of patients with hypertension in 76 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨美托洛尔联合硝苯地平在治疗原发性高血压中的应用价值。方法 76例原发性高血压患者,根据不同治疗方式分为对照组38例(口服硝苯地平缓释片)和试验组38例(美托洛尔+硝苯地平联合治疗),治疗3个月后比较2组疗效。结果试验组治疗总有效率为92.1%明显高于对照组的73.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组患者血压下降幅度较对照组更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组药物不良反应发生率为7.9%低于对照组的28.9%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论美托洛尔联合硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压具有安全性高、降压效果显著,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the value of clinical application of metoprolol combined with nifedipine in the treatment of essential hypertension. Methods 76 cases of patients with essential hypertension were divided into the control group (extended release nifedipine tablets alone) and the experimental group (metoprolo] and nifedipine combined treat- ment) ,each of 38 cases. After treatment for 3 months,the therapeutic effect of the 2 groups were observed and compared. Re- suits The total effective rate of the experimental group was 92.1%, which was higher than 73.7 % of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05 ). The blood pressure descend range of the experimental group was more obviously than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of adverse re- action of the experimental group was 7.9% ,which was lower than 28.9% of the control group,and the difference was statisti- cally significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Metoprolol and nifedipine combined treatment has high safety and obvious antihy- pertensive effect in the treatment of essential hypertension, which is worthy of clinical application.
作者 尹灿淑
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2013年第32期3-4,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 美托洛尔 硝苯地平 原发性高血压 Metoprolol Nifedipine Essential hypertension
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1石学宁,杨立森,方永鹏.比索洛尔对原发性高血压患者降压疗效的动态观察[J].中国综合临床,2004,20(11):974-975. 被引量:15
  • 2关瑞云,韩劲草.国产尼索地平治疗Ⅱ级原发性高血压的临床疗效观察[J].临床医学,2005,25(5):4-5. 被引量:8
  • 3张维忠.降压联合治疗的理论和实践问题[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(5):385-386. 被引量:68
  • 4Pepine C J,Handberg EM,Cooper-DeHoff RM,et al.A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease.The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST):a randomized controlled trial.JAMA,2003,290:2805-2816.
  • 5Weber MA,Julius S,Kjeldsen SE,et al.Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE Trial.Lancet,2004,363:2049-2051.
  • 6Mourad JJ,Waeber B,Zannad F,et al.Comparison of different therapeutic strategies in hypertension:a low-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide versus a sequential monotherapy or a stepped-care approach.J Hypertens,2004,22:2379-2386.
  • 7Dahlof B,Sever PS,Poulter NR,et al.Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required,in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA):a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2005,366:895-906.
  • 8Pickkers P,Garcha RS,Schachter M,et al.Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase accounts for the direct vascular effects of hydrochlorothiazide.Hypertension,1999,33:1043-1048.
  • 9Sturkenboom M,Picelli G,Dieleman JP,et al.Patient adherence and persistence with antihypertensive therapy:one-versus two-pill combination.Presented at the 15th European Meeting on Hypertension,Milan,Italy,June 17-21,2005.
  • 10成忠晏.原发性高血压患者的心身护理105例[J].实用临床医药杂志(护理版),2007,3(4):43-44. 被引量:10

共引文献76

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部