期刊文献+

Park-Ang损伤模型在弯矩-转角层面的三维拓展 被引量:4

Three dimensional extension of Park-Ang damage model in moment- rotation level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 准确地评估构件的损伤程度是基于性能抗震设计的基础。地震作用下,钢筋混凝土墩柱的损伤一般是空间的。但目前钢筋混凝土墩柱的损伤模型大多只能考虑定轴力下单向弯曲。并且它们一般是力-位移层面的,这不利于有限元程序直接实现。针对这一问题,对Park-Ang损伤模型在弯矩-转角层面进行了三维拓展,指出了各参量在三维受力下的计算方法。拓展后的损伤模型能够考虑动轴力和双向弯曲,并且能够在有限元单元层面直接实现,有利于数值计算的自动化。 Accurately evaluating the damage of structure member is the basis of performance based seismic design.Damage of reinforced concrete piers and columns are three-dimensional under earthquake.Most of the current damage models for reinforced concrete piers and columns can only consider unidirectional bending under constant axial force.Most of them are in force-deformation level,and this is not conducive to the realization of the finite element program directly.To solve these problems,taking Park-Ang damage model as the prototype,a three dimensional damage model in moment-rotation level was raised.The definitions of the parameters in the model were detailed introduced.The extensional damage model can consider bidirectional bending and dynamic axial force.The model can also be realized in element of finite element program directly which is convenient for automation of numerical calculation.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期141-146,共6页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2013CB036300) 国家自然科学基金项目(51278373) 贵州省科技厅黔科合重大专项字【2011】6014
关键词 基于性能 钢筋混凝土 弯矩-转角 损伤模型 动轴力 双向弯曲 performance based reinforced concrete moment-rotation damage model dynamic axial force bidirectional bending
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kappos AJ. Seismic damage indices for RC buildings: evaluation of concepts and procedures[ J]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 1997, 1(1): 78 -87.
  • 2Williams MS, Sexsmith RG. Seismic damage indices for concrete structures. A state - of - the - art review [ J ]. Earthquake Spectra, t995 11 (2) : 319 -349.
  • 3Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Damage indices and damage measures[ J]. Progress in StructUral Engineering and Materials, 2000, 2( 1 ) : 50 -59.
  • 4Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Ramasco R. Use of damage functionals in earthquake ehgineeringl A comparison between different methods [ J]. Earth- quake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1993,22 ( 10 ) 855 - 868.
  • 5Park Y J, Ang AHS. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111 (4) : 722 -739.
  • 6Park Y - J, Ang AHS, Wen YK. Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985, 111 (4) : 740 - 757.
  • 7王东升,冯启民,王国新.考虑低周疲劳寿命的改进Park-Ang地震损伤模型[J].土木工程学报,2004,32(11):41-49. 被引量:98
  • 8Chung Y S, Meyer C, Shinozuka M. Seismic damage assessment of RC members, Technical Report NCEER - 87 - 0022, National Center for Earth- quake Engineering Research [ R]. State University of New York, Buffalo NY.
  • 9Chung Y S, Meyer C, Shinozuka M. Modeling of concrete damage [ J ]. Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, 1989, 86 ( 3 ) :259 - 271.
  • 10Kratzig W B, Meyer I F, Meskouris K. Damage evolution in reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading[ A ]. in Proceedings of The 5th Inter- national Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability. 1989. San Francisco, California, USA.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Y.J. Park, H. S. Ang. Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings [ J]. Journal of Structure Engineering, ASCE, 1985, 111 (4): 740~757
  • 2R. D Bertero, V. V. Bertero. Performance-based Seismic Engineering: the Need for Reliable Conceptual Comprehensive Approach [J]. Earthquake Eng. Stru Dyn. 2002, 31:627~ 652
  • 3Dawn E. Lehman, Jack P. Moehle. Seismic Performance of Well-Confined Concrete Bridge Columns [ R]. University of California, Berkeley, PEER Report: 98-01
  • 4Y.J. Park, H. S. Ang. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Conerete[ J]. Joumal of Structure Engineering, ASCE. 1985, 111 (4): 722~739
  • 5M.S. Williams, R. G. Sexsmith. Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Structures: A State-of-Art Revietw [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1995, 11 (3): 320~349
  • 6S.K.K. Kunnath. Cumulative Seismic Damage of Reinforced Concrete Bridege Piers [ R ]. University at Buffalo,State University of New York, NCEER Report: 97-0006
  • 7Y.H. Chai, K. M. Romstad. Correlation betwee Stainbased Low-Circle Fatigue and Energy-based Linear Damage Models [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1997, 13 (2): 191 ~208
  • 8刘伯权,白绍良,徐云中,黄宗明.钢筋混凝土柱低周疲劳性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(4):82-89. 被引量:33
  • 9吕大刚,王光远.基于遗传算法的抗震结构智能优化设计[J].地震工程与工程振动,1999,19(2):15-20. 被引量:7
  • 10欧进萍,关新春.磁流变耗能器性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1999,19(4):76-81. 被引量:58

共引文献142

同被引文献48

  • 1王东升,司炳君,艾庆华,孙治国.改进的Park-Ang地震损伤模型及其比较[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(S1):144-150. 被引量:17
  • 2王东升,冯启民,王国新.考虑低周疲劳寿命的改进Park-Ang地震损伤模型[J].土木工程学报,2004,32(11):41-49. 被引量:98
  • 3Park YJ;Ang HS.Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete,1985(04).
  • 4中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路桥梁抗震设计细则(JTG/TB02-01-2008)[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2008.
  • 5Bertero V V. The Need for Multi-level Seismic Design Criteria [ C]//Earthquake Engineering Research at Berkeley- 1996: Papers Presented at 1 lth WCEE. Report No. UCB/EERC - 96/01. University of California at Berkeley, U. S. A. , 1996: 25 - 32.
  • 6C Vision 2000 Committee. Performance-Based Seismic Engineering [ C ]. Report prepared by Stnlctural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento. California. U.S. A., 1995.
  • 7中华人民共和国铁道部.铁路工程抗震设计规范(GB50111-2006)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2006.
  • 8铁道构造物等设计标准及解说-抗震设计[S].日本铁道技术综合研究所,1999.
  • 9American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design [ S ]. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2007.
  • 10Wang M L, Shah S P. Reinforced concrete hysteresis model based on the damage concept [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1987, 15(8) : 993 - 1003.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部