期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙短节段椎弓根钉固定治疗伴后方韧带复合体损伤的胸腰段骨折 被引量:8

Short segmental pedicle instrumentation via the paraspinal approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures complicated with posterior ligamentous complex injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎旁肌间隙入路短节段椎弓根钉固定治疗伴后方韧带复合体损伤的胸腰段骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年10月至2010年6月收治的70例胸腰椎骨折患者资料,男44例,女26例;年龄19~55岁,平均33.4岁。根据治疗方法不同分为经椎旁肌间隙入路短竹段椎弓根钉固定组(经肌间隙固定组,35例)和传统剥离椎旁肌入路短节段椎弓根钉固定组(剥离椎旁肌固定组,35例)。评估两种术式的手术时间、术中出血蛩、术后歼始下地时间、住院时间、手术前、后和未次随访时损伤节段的局部后凸角(LKA)及椎体高度(VBH)变化、术后并发症发生情况,及螺钉置入的准确性。结果所有患者术后随访24~36个月(平均29.3个月)。剥离椎旁肌固定组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后开始下地时间、住院时间均长于或多于经肌间隙固定组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。所有患者在取出内固定前均朱出现内固定失效。两组各置入140枚螺钉,分别有7枚(5.0%)和6枚(4.3%)螺钉切出椎弓根外,两组患者螺钉切出椎弓根外发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组患者的术后、末次随访时的LKA和VBH均较术前增加,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而术后的LKA和VBH与末次随访时比较,差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05)。术前、术后及末次随访时的LKA和VBH.两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论经椎旁肌间隙入路短节段椎弓根钉固定治疗伴后力韧带复合体损伤的胸腰段骨折是安全的,有良好的临床疗效,可有效地维持骨折复位,减少手术损伤。 Objective To study the eMcacy and safety of short segmental pedicle instrumentation via the paraspinal approach for the management of neurologically intact patients with thoracohunbar burst fracture and posterior ligamentous complex injury. Methods From October 2008 to June 2010, 70 such patients were treated in our department. They were 44 males and 26 females, with an average age of 33.4 years (range, from 19 to 55 years). They were divided into 2 groups according to 2 different operative methods. In group A, 35 patients were treated via the paraspinal approach while 35 patients in group B were treated via the traditional open approach. The 2 approaches were compared in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleed- ing, postoperative ambulant time, hospital stay, changes in local kyphosis angle (LKA) and vertebral body height (VBH) at preoperation, postoperation and the last follow-up, postoperative complications and accuracy of screw insertion. Results The time for follow-up ranged from 24 to 36 months (mean, 29. 3 months). The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ambulant time and hospital stay in group B were significantly more than in group A( P 〈 0. 05) . No implant failure occurred in either group. There was no significant difference in pedicle screw cut-out between the 2 groups [7 (5.0%) versus 6 (4.3%) ] ( P 〉 0. 05) . The LKA and VBH increased significantly at postoperation and the last follow-up compared with the preoperation in both groups ( P 〈 0. 05), but there was no significant difference between the postoperation and the last follow-up ( P 〉0. 05). There were no significant differenees between the 2 groups regarding LKA and VBH at preoperation, postoperation and the last follow-up ( P 〉0. 05) . Conclusion The paraspinal approach may result in a good and safe clinical outcome in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury, because it can maintain the fracture reduction effectively and minimize the iatrogenic injury to soft tissues.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期1049-1053,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 骨折 外科手术 微创性 Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Fracture Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Gertzbein SD. Scoliosis Research Society. Muhicenter spine fracture study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1992, 17: 528-540.
  • 2Denis F, Armstrong GW, Searls K, et al. Acute thoraeolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and noanperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984 (189): 142-149.
  • 3Yaecaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30: 2325-2333.
  • 4Gelb D, Ludwig S, Karp JE, et al. Successful treatment of thora- eolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23: 293-301.
  • 5Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30: 123-129.
  • 6Jiang XZ, Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a pereutaneous approach in the treatment of thoraeolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res, 2012, 40: 1343-1356.
  • 7Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, et al. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative manage- ment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1993, 18: 955-970.
  • 8Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD. Conservative treatment of thoraeolumbar burst fractures: a long-term follow-up results with special reference to the load sharing classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33: 2536-2544.
  • 9Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, Mc Gillieuddy JE, et al. Stereotactic navi- gation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neuro- surgery, 2001, 48: 771-778; discussion 778-779.
  • 10Vaecaro AR, Baron EM, Sanfilippo J, et al. Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(11 Suppl): $62-69; discussion S104.

二级参考文献21

  • 1杨惠林,唐天驷,朱国良,洪天禄,许立,陈荣发,郑祖根.胸腰椎骨折经椎弓根内固定治疗中的失误和并发症的分析[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(6):356-359. 被引量:155
  • 2杨惠林,中华骨科杂志,1996年,16卷,356页
  • 3Stephen T. Failed back syndrome[J]. The Neurologis, 2004, 10(5): 257-264.
  • 4Duggal N, Meadioado I, Pares R. et al. Anterior lumbar in- terbody fusion for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: all outcome analysis[J]. Neurosurg, 2004, 54(3): 636-644.
  • 5Wihse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The para-spinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968, 50(5): 919-926.
  • 6Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong transforaminal lumbar interbody degenerative lumbar diseases[J]. 1620. Z, et al. Minimally invasive fusion for the treatment of Spine, 2010, 35(17): 1615-.
  • 7Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, et al. Muhifi dus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open ap- proach[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(2): 316-324.
  • 8Annette K, Werner S, Erich K. In vitro stabi|izing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cases[J]. Spine, 2005, 22(30): E665-E670.
  • 9Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation technique on the flexibility of the lumbar spine [J]. Spine, 2004, 29(4): E65-E70.
  • 10Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally in- vasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications[J]. Neurosurgical focus, 2006, 20(3): 1-5.

共引文献313

同被引文献107

  • 1张毅,钟德君.肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折34例分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(33):366-366. 被引量:1
  • 2李文生,陈永峰.椎旁肌间隙入路在治疗胸腰段骨折中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(17):140-140. 被引量:2
  • 3李晶,吕国华,王冰,卢畅,康意军,马泽民,邓幼文,陈飞,刘伟东.胸腰椎骨折脱位伤椎固定的可行性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):293-296. 被引量:230
  • 4魏富鑫,刘少喻,赵卫东,于滨生,李浩淼,陈柏龄,梁春祥.胸腰椎爆裂性骨折伤椎固定的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):857-860. 被引量:44
  • 5Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H .Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymaticanalysis. Spine. 1996;21 (8):941-944.
  • 6Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspina sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1968;50: 919-926.
  • 7吐尔洪江·吐尔迪,伍政疆.经肌间隙入路与正中常规切口入路植椎弓根钉治疗胸腰段骨折比较研究[J].中国保健营养(中旬刊),2013,23(8):157-157.
  • 8Talebian S, Hosseini M, Bagheri H, et al. Trunk muscle fatigue in subjects with a history of low back pain and a group of healthy controls measured by similarily index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011 ;24:17-22.
  • 9Kawaguchi , Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 2683-2688.
  • 10戴胡明,夏睿,杨家赵,等.椎旁肌间隙入路和传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折对比研究[C].//安徽省医学会骨科学第十三次学术会议论文集.2012:254.257.

引证文献8

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部