期刊文献+

337例慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者临床分析 被引量:7

Clinical analysis of 337 cases of chronic rhinosinusitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的临床症状和体征情况,为临床治疗提供依据。方法:应用SPSS 18.0软件,采用Personχ2检验、Pearson相关分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验,对337例慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的临床资料进行统计学分析。结果:337例患者总VAS评分为(15.9±5.7)分,其中重度症状排名前三位的分别是:鼻塞56例(16.6%)、鼻分泌物或后鼻漏23例(6.8%)、头昏或头痛11例(3.3%),各组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=430.923,P<0.01)。鼻内镜检查评分发现患侧黏膜水肿和分泌物严重程度高于鼻息肉,三组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=128.684,P<0.01)。CT检查评分发现全部阴影排名前三位的部位分别是:上颌窦314侧(46.6%)、窦口鼻道复合体135侧(20.0%)和前筛112侧(16.6%),各组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=803.274,P<0.01)。VAS评分与LundKennedy评分间具有相关性(r=0.516,P<0.05);VAS评分与Lund-Mackay评分间不具有相关性(r=0.213,P>0.05)。结论:临床医师应综合患者的症状、内镜检查及CT检查结果进行合理病情评估,制定个性化的综合治疗方案,严格把握手术适应证,从而提高慢性鼻窦炎的治愈率。 To explore the clinical symptoms and signs situation of chronic rhinosinusitis, for future treat- ment provides the basis. Method:The clinical data of 337 patients with chronic sinusitis were analyzed, using SPSS 18.0 software and conducted Person chi-square test and KruskabWallis test to analysis. Result VAS total score of chronic nasal sinusitis patients is 15.9±5.7. The three top of severe symptoms were: snuffle 56 cases (16.6%), nasal secretions or postnasal drip 23 cases (6.8% ) and dizziness or headache 11 cases(3.3% ), there are statistically significant differences (X^2=430. 923,P〈0.01). Lund-Kennedy score found side with mucosa edema and secretion serious degree higher than nasal polyp, there are statistically significant difference ( X^2 = 128.684, P〈 0.01 ). Lund- Mackay score showed that the three top parts of all shadow were: maxillary sinus 314 side (46.6%), OMC 135 side(20.0%) and the former screen 112 side(16.6%), there are statistically significant differences between groups(X^2 = 803. 274, P〈0.01). The pearson correlation coefficient r between VAS score and Lund Kennedy score is 0. 516, there are correlation(P〈0.05). VAS score and Lund- Mackay(r= 0.213 ), there are not correlation(P〉0.05 ). Conclusion: Comprehensive treatment should be prodceeded according to different symptom severity and sinus lesions parts with patients, grasped the surgery procedures strictly, so as to improve the cure rate.
出处 《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第24期1372-1374,共3页 Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
关键词 鼻窦炎 视觉类比评分 鼻内镜检查评分 CT检查评分 sinusitis visual analog scale score Lund-Kennedy score Lund-Mackay score
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1褚汉启,华小阳,高起学,崔永华.慢性鼻窦炎患者鼻窦CT扫描阴性的原因分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2001,15(5):195-196. 被引量:8
  • 2Ping-Ping Cao,Hua-Bin Li,Bao-Feng Wang,Shui-Bin Wang,Xue-Jun You,Yong-Hua Cui,De-Yun Wang,Martin Desrosiers,Zheng Liu.Distinct immunopathologic characteristics of various types of chronic rhinosinusitis in adult Chinese[J].The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.2009(3)
  • 3Jeong-Whun Kim,Sung-Lyong Hong,Yoon-Keun Kim,Chul Hee Lee,Yang-Gi Min,Chae-Seo Rhee.Histological and immunological features of non-eosinophilic nasal polyps[J].Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2007(6)
  • 4Nomaan Ashraf,Neil Bhattacharyya.Determination of the “incidental” Lund score for the staging of chronic rhinosinusitis[J].Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2001(5)
  • 5VALERIE J. LUND,DAVID W. KENNEDY.Staging for rhinosinusitis[J].Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.1997(3)

二级参考文献3

共引文献7

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部