期刊文献+

不同术式修复指远端不全缺损疗效对比分析

Treatment effect of 5 methods of repairing finger distal defect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨修复指远端不全缺损的最佳术式 ,用五种不同修复术式修复 181例患者的 2 6 2个患指 ,并对创面覆盖物的颜色、质地、出汗情况、温度、感觉、皮下组织多少和患指使用情况等七项指标进行了对比分析。结果显示 ,近节指背逆行筋膜蒂皮瓣和邻指皮瓣修复法的疗效较好 ,且前者明显优于后者 ;其次是全厚皮肤移植 ;臂及腹部皮瓣的各项随诊指标均较前三者差。提示近节指背逆行筋膜蒂皮瓣 I期同指转移是修复同指远端不全缺损的最佳术式。 WT5”BZ]To study the best method to repair finger distal defect.With a survey of prognosis of 181 finger distal defect cascs(262 wound covers)repaircd by 5 methods,analyzed and comprehensively evaluated 7 indexes such as color and quality of covers,perspiration symptom,temperature,sensation,quantity of hypodermis and usage of finger Results showed that the method with retrograde fascia podicle juxta articular dorsal digital skin flap was particularly better than proximal finger skin flap The third was total thick skin transplantation The follow up indexes of methods with arm or belly skin flap were both worse than formers This suggest the method of retrograde fascia podicle juxta articular dorsal digital skin flap is best selection to repair finger distal defect in first period [WT5”HZ]
机构地区 莱阳中心医院
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2000年第23期17-18,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 手指软组织缺损 皮瓣移植 术式 比较 WT5”BZ][HT5”SS]Finger Soft tissue defect Skin flap Transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1汪良能 高学书.整形外科学[M].北京人民卫生出版社,1989.324-332.
  • 2Dellon AL.Evaluation of sensibility and reeducation of sensation in the hand.Baltimore:williams & wilkins.1981,213~215.

共引文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部